So this is supposed to be an example of good management? Looks more like an example of why Microsoft succeeded in spite of its management. I guess when you're milking a monopolistic cash cow with crappy products, you really don't need good management. Think about it. The CEO comes into a meeting with 6 levels of management and proceeds to treat his people like children by acting like a child himself and "teaching the…
How Hard Could it Be? Joel Spolsky recalls what it was like to work for Bill Gates
21–30 of 58 posts
Re: How Hard Could it Be? Joel Spolsky recalls what it was like to work for Bill Gates
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
The original is better--the order of the story and the emotion both work better. Probably has to do with trying to dumb down, sound more professional, and remove the swearing for Inc readers. Joel's Inc Magazine columns compared to his blog writing have pretty much convinced me not to subscribe to Inc..
Joel's Inc Magazine columns compared to his blog writing Most of his articles have been inferior re-writes, to the point that I'm not sure why nobody at Inc. has caught on. Maybe they don't care, but I'd be pissed.
Re: How Hard Could it Be? Joel Spolsky recalls what it was like to work for Bill Gates
#23So this is supposed to be an example of good management? Looks more like an example of why Microsoft succeeded in spite of its management. I guess when you're milking a monopolistic cash cow with crappy products, you really don't need good management. Think about it. The CEO comes into a meeting with 6 levels of management and proceeds to treat his people like children by acting like a child himself and "teaching the…
I have a copy of the first edition of The Road Ahead. Here is the index entry for Internet: Internet, 3-4, 91-100, 91 activities on, 93-97 addresses on, 94 cost of use of, 97-99, 125 e-mail on, 96-97, 124-25 expectations for, 125 foundation of, 97 growth and evolution of, 91, 95-96 and information highway, 3-4, 89, 95, 100, 230, 246 and publication, 95, 123-25 real-time content on, 99 regulation of, 161-63, 204 reven…
Re: How Hard Could it Be? Joel Spolsky recalls what it was like to work for Bill Gates
#24Actually this isn't about what it's like to work for Bill Gates, it's about Joel Spolsky and reflected glory.
Yes, but it has one great takeaway quote that isn't self-serving: > Watching nonprogrammers trying to run software companies is like watching someone who doesn't know how to surf trying to surf. Even if he has great advisers standing on the shore telling him what to do, he still falls off the board again and again. The cult of the M.B.A. likes to believe that you can run organizations that do things that you don't un…
Re: How Hard Could it Be? Joel Spolsky recalls what it was like to work for Bill Gates
#25"When i graduated from college, in 1991" Where's copyediting gone to?
“You ended that sentence with a preposition…Bastard!” -Richard Dean Anderson (as Jack O'Niell)
But I figured why not check the Google first, just in case. First thing I see is an old post from the inestimable Language Log arguing that the quote isn't Churchill's at all: http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001715.h...
Basically, if you're famous, all the best jokes get attributed to you.
Re: How Hard Could it Be? Joel Spolsky recalls what it was like to work for Bill Gates
#26So this is supposed to be an example of good management? Looks more like an example of why Microsoft succeeded in spite of its management. I guess when you're milking a monopolistic cash cow with crappy products, you really don't need good management. Think about it. The CEO comes into a meeting with 6 levels of management and proceeds to treat his people like children by acting like a child himself and "teaching the…
Re: How Hard Could it Be? Joel Spolsky recalls what it was like to work for Bill Gates
#27Actually this isn't about what it's like to work for Bill Gates, it's about Joel Spolsky and reflected glory.
Re: How Hard Could it Be? Joel Spolsky recalls what it was like to work for Bill Gates
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
The original is better--the order of the story and the emotion both work better. Probably has to do with trying to dumb down, sound more professional, and remove the swearing for Inc readers. Joel's Inc Magazine columns compared to his blog writing have pretty much convinced me not to subscribe to Inc..
Joel's Inc Magazine columns compared to his blog writing Most of his articles have been inferior re-writes, to the point that I'm not sure why nobody at Inc. has caught on. Maybe they don't care, but I'd be pissed.