Angry? It makes you angry but that doesn't mean it's angry. Just like hate speech that causes you to hate but isn't necessarily motivated by hatred.
Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed
21–30 of 142 posts
Re: Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed
#22Worth reading the entire article, it's a great, if depressing read. I seriously wonder Facebook is up to the challenge here - they made algorithmic changes to make the news feed a better place and it very obviously failed. And yet they haven't changed a thing in reaction. Was anyone even looking? It all feels incredibly reactionary: make a change to answer your critics and then forget all about it until it becomes an…
Re: Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed
#23> the “angry” reaction dominates many pages, with “Fox News driving the most angry reactions of anyone, with nearly double that of anyone else.” So does this mean that Fox News is dominating the news feed because of liberal people hating on it, or is it because of articles that Fox News writes that riles up their base?
But to answer your question within your own worldview, it's both.
Re: Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed
#24why is fox news “angry” yet i’m sure feeds full of aoc and black lives matter would be considered woke. Biased article. The anger is very prevalent with both sides.
Re: Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed
#25Long time ago, my facebook newsfeed was full of my friends' sharing, it's been very useful place for us to keep friends update. But now, it's a different place. It's a place for ads, for livestream, for real "social" stuffs, but most of them is useless to me for what i use facebook for.
Re: Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed
#26why is fox news “angry” yet i’m sure feeds full of aoc and black lives matter would be considered woke. Biased article. The anger is very prevalent with both sides.
Dividing the world into two "sides" isn't good for us.
I don't think the world of political discourse is really divided into two "sides" as you imply, despite that being useful for media that make money from making people angry.
Re: Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed
#27Re: Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed
#28Re: Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed
#29Long time ago, my facebook newsfeed was full of my friends' sharing, it's been very useful place for us to keep friends update. But now, it's a different place. It's a place for ads, for livestream, for real "social" stuffs, but most of them is useless to me for what i use facebook for.
Re: Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed
#30> ...Instead, it’s often an angry, reactive place where people go to get worked up and to get scared.
I haven't checked to see if this has been studied, but I'd wager a years salary that information which causes fear and/or outrage are highly addictive and that Facebook's core crowd are hooked. I'd also wager that this addiction is why so many aren't concerned with whether or not the information is accurate, as long as they get their dose.