Live data from Hacker News

Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed

niemanlab.org

21–30 of 142 posts

Re: Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed

#21

Angry? It makes you angry but that doesn't mean it's angry. Just like hate speech that causes you to hate but isn't necessarily motivated by hatred.

Read the article. "Angry" in this context is the Facebook reaction (such as the "like").

Re: Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed

#22
post #2

Worth reading the entire article, it's a great, if depressing read. I seriously wonder Facebook is up to the challenge here - they made algorithmic changes to make the news feed a better place and it very obviously failed. And yet they haven't changed a thing in reaction. Was anyone even looking? It all feels incredibly reactionary: make a change to answer your critics and then forget all about it until it becomes an…

Perhaps Facebook’s algorithms aren’t the issue. Maybe WE are the problem :)

Re: Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed

#23

> the “angry” reaction dominates many pages, with “Fox News driving the most angry reactions of anyone, with nearly double that of anyone else.” So does this mean that Fox News is dominating the news feed because of liberal people hating on it, or is it because of articles that Fox News writes that riles up their base?

I think it's healthier to avoid dividing everybody into two categories, and interpreting everything with respect to those.

But to answer your question within your own worldview, it's both.

Re: Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed

#25
post #3

Long time ago, my facebook newsfeed was full of my friends' sharing, it's been very useful place for us to keep friends update. But now, it's a different place. It's a place for ads, for livestream, for real "social" stuffs, but most of them is useless to me for what i use facebook for.

My feed is still pretty reasonable, but I also aggressively delete people I don't interact with and use the "Block all from " option very liberally. Also, unfollowing people who you need to be friends with (for family reasons, etc.) but whose crap you don't want to see can work pretty well.

Re: Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed

#26

why is fox news “angry” yet i’m sure feeds full of aoc and black lives matter would be considered woke. Biased article. The anger is very prevalent with both sides.

"Angry" is the facebook reaction.

Dividing the world into two "sides" isn't good for us.

I don't think the world of political discourse is really divided into two "sides" as you imply, despite that being useful for media that make money from making people angry.

Re: Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed

#29
post #3

Long time ago, my facebook newsfeed was full of my friends' sharing, it's been very useful place for us to keep friends update. But now, it's a different place. It's a place for ads, for livestream, for real "social" stuffs, but most of them is useless to me for what i use facebook for.

I’ve noticed more people engaged with LinkedIn over the last year. People are sharing things I once saw on Facebook years ago: personal achievements and struggles, side hobbies, congratulations, etc. Surprisingly, I’ve found myself considering engaging with content on LinkedIn a few times the last few months.

Re: Facebook’s algorithm change has spurred an angry, Fox News-dominated News Feed

#30
Seeing the top shared and engaged content in this article is pretty much the exact reason I and pretty much everyone I know abandoned Facebook long ago. It has been reduced to mostly just a place for people who are highly addicted to outragePorn clickbait. As the article says:

> ...Instead, it’s often an angry, reactive place where people go to get worked up and to get scared.

I haven't checked to see if this has been studied, but I'd wager a years salary that information which causes fear and/or outrage are highly addictive and that Facebook's core crowd are hooked. I'd also wager that this addiction is why so many aren't concerned with whether or not the information is accurate, as long as they get their dose.

Post reply on HN