Live data from Hacker News

Revolut CFO resigns following money laundering controversy

techcrunch.com

21–30 of 256 posts

Re: Revolut CFO resigns following money laundering controversy

#21
post #6

Anti-money laundering regulations are completely crazy these days. I recently opened a child bank account (in the UK) and the application form had one page for parents and child's details then 5 pages related to money laundering... Edit: here we are... Send in the immature downvotes.

I kinda agree but money laundering is a big problem too.

The onus is on legislators to craft anti-laundering regulations that work while minimizing false positives. I wonder if those 5 pages of forms actually negatively impacted any criminal activity.

Re: Revolut CFO resigns following money laundering controversy

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Blame the banks then. The regulations are only like this since the banks have consistently and deliberately facilitated money laundering.

Banks' business is to manage money not to turn money away... It's not unethical behaviour. It's simple business. No-one in any business is going to ask where their customers got their money from, you just try to make customers spend their cash on you rather than a competitor. Banks have to comply with the law, of course, but beyond that you cannot expect them to hurt their business for no reason. This "holier than th…

White collar crime continues to be something that they can get away with. IMHO the solution is not more rules but simply applying existing laws less leniently. There are a lot of bank executives that are not nearly worried enough about going to jail.

Re: Revolut CFO resigns following money laundering controversy

#24

The article summarizes much more original research from the Telegraph: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2019/02/28/revolut-fa... Alas, that is behind a paywall.

Telegraph article

ONE of the UK’s most promising financial technology start-ups has been accused of violating basic banking rules by failing to block thousands of potentially suspicious transactions on its platform.

Documents seen by The Daily Telegraph show that for three months last year Revolut switched off an automated system designed to stop dubious money transfers.

As a result, thousands of illegal transactions may have passed through the London-based start-up’s digital banking system between July and September of 2018.

Revolut launched an internal investigation in late 2018 after a whistleblower contacted Revolut’s board about serious issues with its sanctions screening system.

In a letter to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in September 2018, Revolut’s head of legal Tom Hambrett wrote: “The investigation concluded that the original decision to turn off the transaction-halting mechanism was erroneous and implied a remediable systems and controls failing.”

Sanctions screening systems automatically check customer records against an official list to identify highrisk transactions and those flagged as “politically exposed persons”.

Revolut, which has grown to over 3m customers around the world since its launch in 2015, contacted the Financial Conduct Authority in September to inform the watchdog of a three-month “failing”, The Telegraph can reveal.

It told the FCA that it had disabled part of its sanctions screening system after it made 8,000 “false positive” flags, incorrectly identifying legitimate transactions as being suspicious and blocking transfers. The company then moved to a compliance system that flagged transactions but did not automatically disable them, Revolut said.

The problems at Revolut follow a string of regulatory issues at other so-called “challenger banks”. Metro Bank was forced to announced plans to raise £350m from investors this week after revealing that it had underestimated the risk level of some of its commercial loans. Metro Bank’s shares fell a further 27pc yesterday after tumbling 16pc on Tuesday as the extent of its issues became clear.

The FCA was only informed of the problems at Revolut after an employee complained to the board about the switch and the fact it did not automatically block suspicious transactions.

The company reactivated its sanctions screening system on Sept 16, Revolut told the FCA.

Revolut told the watchdog it did not believe that it had broken the law during its switch to a different compliance system. “To the best of Revolut’s knowledge there has been no breach of law with respect to sanctions requirements,” the company wrote.

The digital bank has since introduced a new system following the incident last year, it said in the letter.

However, the incident raises questions over Revolut’s ability to stop individuals and companies who are hit by international sanctions from using its app. It follows a report by the bank to the FCA and National Crime Agency last year in which it warned both organisations of suspected money laundering through its app.

The digital bank has suffered a number of departures from its compliance team in the past two years, including two chief risk officers, the chief compliance officer, and two money laundering reporting officers.

A spokesman for the FCA declined to comment. A Revolut spokesman said: “Revolut does not comment on its engagement with its regulators.”

Re: Revolut CFO resigns following money laundering controversy

#25
Hmm... I've been #6000 or so on their waitlist for a card here in Australia for the past 9 months. I've emailed them a couple of time but just been told "be patient". Apparently I can skip 5000 ahead in the the line by referring a friend to their service - however the sheer length of delay and these recent incidents have motivated me to simply cancel my wait for their service.

Perhaps I should check the wait list count again to see if they have had a swathe of cancellations lately? Then again, I am half convinced this is just a made up wait counter to increase the FOMO factor.

EDIT: I am actually #9750 on the wait list, and can bump myself up 6610 places with a referral. About the same as 9 months ago.

Re: Revolut CFO resigns following money laundering controversy

#27
I don't like how aggressively Revolut tries to up sell you its premium service. Revolut's metal card seems more like a status symbol and the service seems secondary.

Additionally they still have no accounts where I am resulting in IBAN fees.

In contrast transferwise may not support "crypto" (Revolut doesn't let you send out or in crypto making it more or less useless) but they are not trying to up sell you and they do have accounts in my country allowing for fast transfers. They don't have fancy metal cards but they have been expanding their services instead.

Re: Revolut CFO resigns following money laundering controversy

#28
post #7
post #3

also CEO of Revolut: "Why aren’t you working on weekends?" https://twitter.com/phillipcaudell/status/110108122935141580...

Wow... I'm genuinely shocked at the at the 27 GET IT DONE clicks. I mean this probably worked for that one weekend and until people got their bonus, but I bet you the moment the people had their bonus they would leave. It's a good sprint strategy but costs you talent and talent hiring in the long run.

If you look more carefully, the icon actually says "GET SH*T DONE". Somehow a little more apt given the current headlines.
Post reply on HN