Anti-money laundering regulations are completely crazy these days. I recently opened a child bank account (in the UK) and the application form had one page for parents and child's details then 5 pages related to money laundering... Edit: here we are... Send in the immature downvotes.
I kinda agree but money laundering is a big problem too.
Revolut CFO resigns following money laundering controversy
21–30 of 256 posts
Re: Revolut CFO resigns following money laundering controversy
#22Re: Revolut CFO resigns following money laundering controversy
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Blame the banks then. The regulations are only like this since the banks have consistently and deliberately facilitated money laundering.
Banks' business is to manage money not to turn money away... It's not unethical behaviour. It's simple business. No-one in any business is going to ask where their customers got their money from, you just try to make customers spend their cash on you rather than a competitor. Banks have to comply with the law, of course, but beyond that you cannot expect them to hurt their business for no reason. This "holier than th…
Re: Revolut CFO resigns following money laundering controversy
#24The article summarizes much more original research from the Telegraph: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2019/02/28/revolut-fa... Alas, that is behind a paywall.
ONE of the UK’s most promising financial technology start-ups has been accused of violating basic banking rules by failing to block thousands of potentially suspicious transactions on its platform.
Documents seen by The Daily Telegraph show that for three months last year Revolut switched off an automated system designed to stop dubious money transfers.
As a result, thousands of illegal transactions may have passed through the London-based start-up’s digital banking system between July and September of 2018.
Revolut launched an internal investigation in late 2018 after a whistleblower contacted Revolut’s board about serious issues with its sanctions screening system.
In a letter to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in September 2018, Revolut’s head of legal Tom Hambrett wrote: “The investigation concluded that the original decision to turn off the transaction-halting mechanism was erroneous and implied a remediable systems and controls failing.”
Sanctions screening systems automatically check customer records against an official list to identify highrisk transactions and those flagged as “politically exposed persons”.
Revolut, which has grown to over 3m customers around the world since its launch in 2015, contacted the Financial Conduct Authority in September to inform the watchdog of a three-month “failing”, The Telegraph can reveal.
It told the FCA that it had disabled part of its sanctions screening system after it made 8,000 “false positive” flags, incorrectly identifying legitimate transactions as being suspicious and blocking transfers. The company then moved to a compliance system that flagged transactions but did not automatically disable them, Revolut said.
The problems at Revolut follow a string of regulatory issues at other so-called “challenger banks”. Metro Bank was forced to announced plans to raise £350m from investors this week after revealing that it had underestimated the risk level of some of its commercial loans. Metro Bank’s shares fell a further 27pc yesterday after tumbling 16pc on Tuesday as the extent of its issues became clear.
The FCA was only informed of the problems at Revolut after an employee complained to the board about the switch and the fact it did not automatically block suspicious transactions.
The company reactivated its sanctions screening system on Sept 16, Revolut told the FCA.
Revolut told the watchdog it did not believe that it had broken the law during its switch to a different compliance system. “To the best of Revolut’s knowledge there has been no breach of law with respect to sanctions requirements,” the company wrote.
The digital bank has since introduced a new system following the incident last year, it said in the letter.
However, the incident raises questions over Revolut’s ability to stop individuals and companies who are hit by international sanctions from using its app. It follows a report by the bank to the FCA and National Crime Agency last year in which it warned both organisations of suspected money laundering through its app.
The digital bank has suffered a number of departures from its compliance team in the past two years, including two chief risk officers, the chief compliance officer, and two money laundering reporting officers.
A spokesman for the FCA declined to comment. A Revolut spokesman said: “Revolut does not comment on its engagement with its regulators.”
Re: Revolut CFO resigns following money laundering controversy
#25Perhaps I should check the wait list count again to see if they have had a swathe of cancellations lately? Then again, I am half convinced this is just a made up wait counter to increase the FOMO factor.
EDIT: I am actually #9750 on the wait list, and can bump myself up 6610 places with a referral. About the same as 9 months ago.
Re: Revolut CFO resigns following money laundering controversy
#26I'm a premium/black card client, and will be removing my money right away and closing my account. Their behavior is just so hypocrite
Re: Revolut CFO resigns following money laundering controversy
#27Additionally they still have no accounts where I am resulting in IBAN fees.
In contrast transferwise may not support "crypto" (Revolut doesn't let you send out or in crypto making it more or less useless) but they are not trying to up sell you and they do have accounts in my country allowing for fast transfers. They don't have fancy metal cards but they have been expanding their services instead.
Re: Revolut CFO resigns following money laundering controversy
#28also CEO of Revolut: "Why aren’t you working on weekends?" https://twitter.com/phillipcaudell/status/110108122935141580...
Wow... I'm genuinely shocked at the at the 27 GET IT DONE clicks. I mean this probably worked for that one weekend and until people got their bonus, but I bet you the moment the people had their bonus they would leave. It's a good sprint strategy but costs you talent and talent hiring in the long run.
Re: Revolut CFO resigns following money laundering controversy
#29I guess he wasn't hitting his KPIs or working enough weekends.