Live data from Hacker News

EU Commission presents draft directive to ban some plastic waste

dw.com

21–30 of 74 posts

Re: EU Commission presents draft directive to ban some plastic waste

#21
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can avoid having poor people pay more by creating recycle points, you pay more on a soda can or bottle but you get the extra money back when you return the empty can/bottle. (I know some will say is not comfortable to do this so we need more education to have people understand why this is important)

In fact in Norway, bottle returns are accepted in pretty much every store or gas station (pretty much anywhere that sells bottled drinks), and have been an income source for kids or poor people for decades. It's contributed to a collection rate in the 95%+ range, so it doesn't just mitigate the increased costs, it provides income.

Exactly, so who would not like this? Someone that uses a lot and can't be bother to bring the bottles back but he would like the money returned.

I know that someone could invent now some extremely rare scenario but I am talking about a big majority.

Re: EU Commission presents draft directive to ban some plastic waste

#22
It's important to consider that people with some disabilities rely on plastic straws to be able to drink:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-derbyshire-43879489...

Plastic straws and polystyrene plates are also common materials for arts and crafts.

Whilst pollution is certainly an issue that must be tackled, banning disposable plastic products does have its drawbacks. I'm not saying a ban should not occur, but its implications should be considered.

Re: EU Commission presents draft directive to ban some plastic waste

#23
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That can work to a point, but if environmental policies permanently increase the cost of things like energy then poverty reduction programs must pay that cost. That in turn inflates the cost of poverty reduction programs, making them require increased taxation. This in turn drags down the economy, creating more poverty.

Is not cheaper to help only the poor then have the plastic,energy etc cheap for everyone? Seems like the ones that consume and pollute the most will have the most too lose.

The poor and especially the middle class account for the vast majority of consumption and pollution in aggregate.

Per capita the rich consume more, but not as much more as you might think. The typical multi-millionaire or even billionaire does not personally consume 1000X or 1000000X more than your typical member of the middle class. Maybe 10X more at most. Beyond a certain point this is "paper wealth." Diminishing marginal utility of goods and services kicks in pretty hard once you reach the upper middle class to "lower rich" brackets. You just don't get much more value from consuming more because you've hit the value limits of technology and/or human subjective perception.

The rich also derive their wealth largely through poor and middle class consumption. They either run industries directly, invest in them, or profit off rents that could not be paid without other industrial activity to subsidize them.

Re: EU Commission presents draft directive to ban some plastic waste

#24
> Curbing the use of plastic cups for beverages

I wonder what this will mean for events & festivals. E.g. Amsterdam has made it a policy that big events (including normal bars when the event is going on) must issue plastic cups to curb broken class everywhere. Will we have to go back to glass, or drink our beer out of paper cups?

> as well as plastic food containers, such as the ones used for take-away.

I'm open to this, it sucks to have to throw so much crap away after ordering take-away, but I haven't seen a container yet that would be suitable for e.g. 80 degree centigrade soups, stews etc. What are the alternatives that are cheap enough for disposable take-away use?

> Producers of fishing gear — which accounts for 27 percent of beach litter — will be required to cover the costs of waste collection in ports.

I'm worried about how making manufacturers pay for something like this will produce unintended externalities. I can also buy thin plastic lines that wink wink totally aren't intended for fishing. Won't it be trivial to avoid these taxes?

> Each member state should use a deposit system or other measure in order to collect 90 percent of plastic bottles used in their country by 2025.

I wouldn't mind such a system where you e.g. get 1 EUR back for each bottle, but it's going to have to be something like that. The current deposit fees on plastic bottles are too low, once you're earning enough money it doesn't make any financial sense to return them.

Re: EU Commission presents draft directive to ban some plastic waste

#25
post #19
post #2

It’s worth noting that I’ve seen poor families in France reusing plastic forks and knives. Like always, this kind of policy hurts the poor a lot more.

I can't see this killing off disposable cutlery completely, there are too many businesses that rely on it. Disposable cutlery can be made from wood for example (and often is, e.g. chopsticks). That said, is it really an issue? A complete set of cutlery for a family of 3 would cost less than 10USD, delivered (based on a quick eBay search). No doubt plastic "non-disposable" cutlery is or would be cheaply available loca…

Yes, but when you are limited in your transportation, and can’t buy online, and that’s the case for some poor families, the local supermarket and their plastic cutleries is a solution that just works.

Re: EU Commission presents draft directive to ban some plastic waste

#26
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Environmental policy is probably the main factor that has driven a wedge between progressives/liberals and the working class. Nearly all environmental regulations are regressive when considered as taxes. The rich can afford to pay more for cleaner energy, durable goods, recycling, and so on. The poor cannot. I am not saying that either concern is invalid. Environmental concerns are real. I am simply pointing out a po…

Environmental collapse also disproportionately hurts the poor. When a drought strikes, they’re the first to starve. At least the pain inflicted by regulations can be mitigated, while collapse leads to something like Libya.

I was not arguing otherwise. Whenever I bring up issues like this I get a lot of "shoot the messenger."

My point was not that environmental concerns are wrong but that they do tend to decrease the economic well being of poor and middle class people more right now vs. the status quo. That in turn tends to anger these classes of people right now, causing them to vote for people like Donald Trump. Trump, a super-hard-right Republican, won largely because of working class traditionally progressive economic concerns.

The poor also cannot afford the luxury of thinking about the future. When you are poor your primary concern is getting out of poverty right f'ing now. Screw the future. The rich on the other hand can sacrifice for the future because they have abundance.

Try some grinding poverty and come back and tell me how much you care about what happens in 100 years. Now try some grinding poverty with children. Tell me how much you care about the great Pacific garbage patch after you watch your kids suffer a bit.

This is why I think what I call "abstinence based" environmental policies are doomed. I draw a deliberate analogy with right-wing abstinence-based sex-ed, which also fails pretty reliably. Abstinence based environmental policy is any attempt to solve environmental problems by preaching and shaming the poor and middle class into reducing consumption for the sake of some future ideal that might as well be heaven-and-hell as far as they are concerned here and now.

The only way we will create a world where we care about the future is to elevate as many people as possible out of poverty. This means we must build systems that create abundance now and try to figure out how to do so as sustainably as possible. If people can't afford the luxury of caring about the future, nothing serious will ever be done about massive problems like climate change.

Re: EU Commission presents draft directive to ban some plastic waste

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Poverty reduction programs, not trashing the planet, is the correct response to that

Being able to buy products that are most cost effective is the only real way we’ve found to be able to reduce poverty.

If we factor the recycling costs in this products and implement that recycling then all is fine, the products have the correct price and the recycling also takes place.

The problem is when the environmental costs are not included and it must be paid by the next generation.

About energy some countries have special prices for the first X KW of energy used for poor families, so it is possible to have the energy prices increased so people would try turning off things they don't need.

Re: EU Commission presents draft directive to ban some plastic waste

#28
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, it’s what I meant. Plastic culterly can be found in your local supermarket for very cheap, and when you don’t have a car, and can’t received packages from Amazon, it can be truly your unique solution.

But is not everyone you are thinking of have already metal tools? you use those for life. I see plastic things used for fast foods or maybe you have some cheap gathering and don't want to use your good tools so they are not lost.

Of course metal and wood tools are usually of a better quality, and they are nicer. I would avoid plastic until I can’t financially. However, the rationale of poor families buy plastic ustensils does make sense. You can buy a lot more for 2 or 3 euros, can reuse it, and it’s more easily obtainable.

Re: EU Commission presents draft directive to ban some plastic waste

#29
post #24

> Curbing the use of plastic cups for beverages I wonder what this will mean for events & festivals. E.g. Amsterdam has made it a policy that big events (including normal bars when the event is going on) must issue plastic cups to curb broken class everywhere. Will we have to go back to glass, or drink our beer out of paper cups? > as well as plastic food containers, such as the ones used for take-away. I'm open to t…

>I wouldn't mind such a system where you e.g. get 1 EUR back for each bottle, but it's going to have to be something like that. The current deposit fees on plastic bottles are too low, once you're earning enough money it doesn't make any financial sense to return them.

I think in some countries if you don't want to get your money back you leave the bottles and cans near the garbage bin or other places and a kid or a poor person will return it and make some money.

Re: EU Commission presents draft directive to ban some plastic waste

#30
post #22

It's important to consider that people with some disabilities rely on plastic straws to be able to drink: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-derbyshire-43879489... Plastic straws and polystyrene plates are also common materials for arts and crafts. Whilst pollution is certainly an issue that must be tackled, banning disposable plastic products does have its drawbacks. I'm not saying a ban should not occur, but…

s/plastic straws/straws/ ... there's nothing to prevent you from using paper, waxed paper, or reusable metal drinking straws except a price increase.
Post reply on HN