Live data from Hacker News

Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak

craigmurray.org.uk

21–30 of 105 posts

Re: Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak

#21
Ford Foundation is no longer controlled by the Ford Family, and has divested itself of all Ford assets. I don't think you can reasonably believe that funder interference, or fear of funder interference, would alter how this into gets reported. You certainly can't make that claim about Ford, specifically.

I've also worked with OSF before, and can absolutely say that they routinely fund matters that fit the ideology of the Soros families, even if those grants fund activities critical of wealthy investment managers.

Re: Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak

#22
That article is bullshit. Yes, we can't access the raw data - true, but understandable. The editor in-chief of the SZ says they are still working on it and will expose more and more "in waves", often getting statements from the accused before or sharing it with law enforcement agencies. And no, they didn't focus on Russia or Assad, one of the main revelations was that three members of Iceland's government (PM, financial, interior) have offshore accounts. And the scandal was, that the PM bailed out banks he had personal investments in. so no, "corporate media" isn't ignoring "the west". Also, as published pretty much everywhere, a number of heads of state had offshore accounts, many allies of "the west": Mauricio Macri, president or Argentina. Bidzina Ivanishvill. ex PM of Georgia Sigmundur something something, PM of Iceland. Ayad H. Allawi, ex PM of Iraq. Ali Abu-Ragheb, ex PM of Jordan. Hamad Jasim J.M. Al-Thani, ex PM of Qatar. Sheik Al-Thani, Emir of Qatar. HRH Prince Salman, King of Saudi Arabia Ahmad Al-Nirghani, ex-president of Sudan Sultan Al-Nahyan, president of the UAE. Pavlo Lazarenko, ex-PM of Ukraine. Petro Poroshenko, president of Ukraine.

Also pretty much every major german bank is on the list, as published widely, and new evidence in the Siemens scandal came to light. Non-germans didn't get fully published yet, because the journalists give them the chance to respond to the accusations (having an offshore account isn't illegal by itself, but is often used to hide the identitiy of the owner to do illegal things).

To think, that for a database of 2.6tb, that data can just be made public and seeded (see main HN thread) is absurd. Source confidentiality and all

Re: Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak

#23
In the first week this is just an ultra paranoid reaction. The comments about corporate ownership in view of the guardian being owned by an independent trust, and about them destroying the wikileaks info indicate that the author is either poorly informed or a shit-stirrer. The UK press in particular has to vet stuff before in prints in order to avoid being sued out of existence, and as a matter of good journalism will stretch this out over the summer

Re: Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak

#26
post #19

This to me is almost bigger news than the leak itself. Its so obviously and blatantly stacked one can't help but conclude media has been thoroughly "captured".

On CNN, top news is about some soccer star charged with DUI.

And nothing about this Panama thing on the home page.

Re: Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak

#27

That article is bullshit. Yes, we can't access the raw data - true, but understandable. The editor in-chief of the SZ says they are still working on it and will expose more and more "in waves", often getting statements from the accused before or sharing it with law enforcement agencies. And no, they didn't focus on Russia or Assad, one of the main revelations was that three members of Iceland's government (PM, financ…

Also wasn't this a law firm whose data was leaked? A lot of that information is probably financial and personal records which would be massively irresponsible, not to mention highly illegal, to release in a dump.

Re: Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak

#28

That article is bullshit. Yes, we can't access the raw data - true, but understandable. The editor in-chief of the SZ says they are still working on it and will expose more and more "in waves", often getting statements from the accused before or sharing it with law enforcement agencies. And no, they didn't focus on Russia or Assad, one of the main revelations was that three members of Iceland's government (PM, financ…

>That article is bullshit.

I found the article useful actually.

I mistakenly assumed, very naively, that these people handling the leaks were wikileaks kind of people and not these other kind of people:

>The leak is being managed by the grandly but laughably named “International Consortium of Investigative Journalists”, which is funded and organised entirely by the USA’s Center for Public Integrity. Their funders include

>Ford Foundation >Carnegie Endowment >Rockefeller Family Fund >W K Kellogg Foundation >Open Society Foundation (Soros)

Re: Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak

#29
It's only day 1, and the ICIJ has said they have at least 14 days of "major revelations" mapped out in advance.

I expect we'll be seeing stories from the Panama Papers for months to come, spaced out for maximum impact, similarly to Snowden's leaks.

If a month goes by and not a single story is contrary to american corporate interests, the author's position may be reasonably supportable. But day 1? Not a chance. They went for the most immediate impact-- two CURRENT heads of state.

Re: Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak

#30
I thought so too, it's silly to pretend this is all about putin putin putin and his cellists. Besides i would expect the russians to have moved their money in some offshore corner in middle east rather than panama. The Bloomberg website does not even report it in its frontpage right now (eventhough possibly many of their customers are in the list). However i trust that they are keeping the best bits for the starting week.

This seems very interesting btw. We should just face the fact that offshore banking exists and is neither good or evil, its a product of globalization and the emerging stateless jet set. If anything , maybe more and more people should take advantage of it.

Post reply on HN