I've also worked with OSF before, and can absolutely say that they routinely fund matters that fit the ideology of the Soros families, even if those grants fund activities critical of wealthy investment managers.
Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak
21–30 of 105 posts
Re: Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak
#22Also pretty much every major german bank is on the list, as published widely, and new evidence in the Siemens scandal came to light. Non-germans didn't get fully published yet, because the journalists give them the chance to respond to the accusations (having an offshore account isn't illegal by itself, but is often used to hide the identitiy of the owner to do illegal things).
To think, that for a database of 2.6tb, that data can just be made public and seeded (see main HN thread) is absurd. Source confidentiality and all
Re: Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak
#23Re: Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak
#24Re: Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak
#25Re: Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak
#26This to me is almost bigger news than the leak itself. Its so obviously and blatantly stacked one can't help but conclude media has been thoroughly "captured".
And nothing about this Panama thing on the home page.
Re: Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak
#27That article is bullshit. Yes, we can't access the raw data - true, but understandable. The editor in-chief of the SZ says they are still working on it and will expose more and more "in waves", often getting statements from the accused before or sharing it with law enforcement agencies. And no, they didn't focus on Russia or Assad, one of the main revelations was that three members of Iceland's government (PM, financ…
Re: Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak
#28That article is bullshit. Yes, we can't access the raw data - true, but understandable. The editor in-chief of the SZ says they are still working on it and will expose more and more "in waves", often getting statements from the accused before or sharing it with law enforcement agencies. And no, they didn't focus on Russia or Assad, one of the main revelations was that three members of Iceland's government (PM, financ…
I found the article useful actually.
I mistakenly assumed, very naively, that these people handling the leaks were wikileaks kind of people and not these other kind of people:
>The leak is being managed by the grandly but laughably named “International Consortium of Investigative Journalists”, which is funded and organised entirely by the USA’s Center for Public Integrity. Their funders include
>Ford Foundation >Carnegie Endowment >Rockefeller Family Fund >W K Kellogg Foundation >Open Society Foundation (Soros)
Re: Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak
#29I expect we'll be seeing stories from the Panama Papers for months to come, spaced out for maximum impact, similarly to Snowden's leaks.
If a month goes by and not a single story is contrary to american corporate interests, the author's position may be reasonably supportable. But day 1? Not a chance. They went for the most immediate impact-- two CURRENT heads of state.
Re: Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% from Panama Leak
#30This seems very interesting btw. We should just face the fact that offshore banking exists and is neither good or evil, its a product of globalization and the emerging stateless jet set. If anything , maybe more and more people should take advantage of it.