> His lifetime deal with Nike could eventually become something similar to Michael Jordan’s. Jordan, 52, is officially the chief executive officer of the Jordan Brand, which continues to release new shoes. Sales of Air Jordan brand shoes topped $2.6 billion last year, according to Forbes. I had to read that last figure twice...the first time, I thought it meant $2.6 billion total , which seems like a reasonable amoun…
> for one line of shoes There are at least a few new Jordan sneakers released every single week. http://sneakernews.com/air-jordan-release-dates/
LeBron James Signs Unprecedented Lifetime Contract with Nike
21–30 of 35 posts
Re: LeBron James Signs Unprecedented Lifetime Contract with Nike
#22> His lifetime deal with Nike could eventually become something similar to Michael Jordan’s. Jordan, 52, is officially the chief executive officer of the Jordan Brand, which continues to release new shoes. Sales of Air Jordan brand shoes topped $2.6 billion last year, according to Forbes. I had to read that last figure twice...the first time, I thought it meant $2.6 billion total , which seems like a reasonable amoun…
Hands down, Air Jordan is the best logo ever created. Designers might not think so, but people bought $2.6 million worth of products last year just because of it. It's hard to beat that.
Jordan may be retired but his product line is thriving. It's a beast onto itself.
And yes, I know the shoes aren't necessarily inherently better than a cheap pair of sneakers but, hey, it's a cool shoe that can't be beat. I don't know how you quantify cool but those shoes are cool.
Re: LeBron James Signs Unprecedented Lifetime Contract with Nike
#23> His lifetime deal with Nike could eventually become something similar to Michael Jordan’s. Jordan, 52, is officially the chief executive officer of the Jordan Brand, which continues to release new shoes. Sales of Air Jordan brand shoes topped $2.6 billion last year, according to Forbes. I had to read that last figure twice...the first time, I thought it meant $2.6 billion total , which seems like a reasonable amoun…
Hands down, Air Jordan is the best logo ever created. Designers might not think so, but people bought $2.6 million worth of products last year just because of it. It's hard to beat that.
Re: LeBron James Signs Unprecedented Lifetime Contract with Nike
#24Ah, Nike. The company with worse fanboys than Apple. Nike managed to conceal the fact that Air Jordans were inflated with sulfur hexafluoride, not air. They needed a big molecule that wouldn't slowly leak through the bladder. It took them 14 years to come up with a bladder lining that would hold nitrogen.
No idea if they tried to "conceal" that though. Seems to be around the same time CFCs were used in refrigeration.
Re: LeBron James Signs Unprecedented Lifetime Contract with Nike
#25I'm as impressed or more with Under Armour snagging Bryce Harper, Tom Brady, Steph Curry and Jordan Spieth (arguably the top players in their sports currently).
At likely much better contracts than their competitors have for their marquee athletes.
[1] http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/13672569/stephen-curry-ext...
Re: LeBron James Signs Unprecedented Lifetime Contract with Nike
#26Re: LeBron James Signs Unprecedented Lifetime Contract with Nike
#27Re: LeBron James Signs Unprecedented Lifetime Contract with Nike
#28> His lifetime deal with Nike could eventually become something similar to Michael Jordan’s. Jordan, 52, is officially the chief executive officer of the Jordan Brand, which continues to release new shoes. Sales of Air Jordan brand shoes topped $2.6 billion last year, according to Forbes. I had to read that last figure twice...the first time, I thought it meant $2.6 billion total , which seems like a reasonable amoun…
I think you have to compare the "brand" of Jordan vs. Lebron. Jordan has had almost 30 years to mature. Lebron is not even half that. Interesting to see how this compares & will play out compared to other deals (Under Armour has equity deals with Brady / Curry) which insinuates longer term deals - even if it's not explicit.
This is a reasonable thing to say, but celebrity branding doesn't necessarily get better with time, and I think is actually particularly unlikely to do so compared to other forms of branding.