Satya Nadella – Microsoft's CEO
191–200 of 584 posts
Re: Satya Nadella – Microsoft's CEO
#192I'd never thought I'd say this after the years of aggressive (and at times anti-competitive) dominance but I think the world needs a strong Microsoft again. Although Microsoft remains very strong in the corporate world, its presence in the Internet and mobile worlds are now pretty limited and leaving the two power-houses of Google and Apple to shape the industry. Satya has done a good job with Azure, and it will be i…
I will switch to windows if they make it as easy to develop on as it is on unix. Maybe have a fully supported unix commandline emulator?
Re: Satya Nadella – Microsoft's CEO
#193Re: Satya Nadella – Microsoft's CEO
#194Just asking, how can a new CEO change Microsoft's directions. Or What suggestions would you give Satya, if you were to meet him today?
I'd say, from my armchair: take a long hard look at what's really happening out there, step out of your bubble. Stop this ridiculous attitude towards competitors and open source, at least long enough to see what they have to offer. Get your people some Macs, get your server people exposed to some Linux, get them some iPhones and iPads and Android devices, and make them see why you've been losing ground. Those competi…
Re: Satya Nadella – Microsoft's CEO
#195What would our industry be like if it respects tradition? Less reinventing the wheel every decade?
Re: Satya Nadella – Microsoft's CEO
#196Re: Satya Nadella – Microsoft's CEO
#197I'd never thought I'd say this after the years of aggressive (and at times anti-competitive) dominance but I think the world needs a strong Microsoft again. Although Microsoft remains very strong in the corporate world, its presence in the Internet and mobile worlds are now pretty limited and leaving the two power-houses of Google and Apple to shape the industry. Satya has done a good job with Azure, and it will be i…
No, I much prefer today's world of Google, Apple, Samsung and FOSS in all its myriad forms battling it out. There's more developer frameworks than ever available to us. More languages. More everything.
No. I don't want to go back.
Re: Satya Nadella – Microsoft's CEO
#198Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd take PowerShell over bash any day. If you mean the console window, that's completely independent of the applicating running inside both on Unix-likes and Windows and admittedly there are things to improve. However, there are ConEmu, Console2 and others which by now work really, really well.
Why are all of them column based? You cant arbitrarily resize a console window in 2014?
Re: Satya Nadella – Microsoft's CEO
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
>> When these kids grow up and enter the workforce, they will want to use the tools they know, and will not understand the point of in-house Windows sysadmins, or the software licensing fees. When your company reaches a certain size, auditors and such will put an end to that. "This gets backed up where?" "Where's your antivirus?" "Why aren't you using _STANDARD_PRODUCTS_?" etc
Your auditors are asking about specific software??? Ours never did. Processes, yes, specific brands? No way.
Re: Satya Nadella – Microsoft's CEO
#200Can someone in the know shed some light on how a CEO of a corporation this big gets selected, from searching for and vetting candidates to the competition involved amongst nominees vying for the position? I imagine it's less about an admissions-type board reviewing applicants' credentials and accomplishments and more about years and years of strategic positioning, favors, and relationship building with people that ma…
It's easy to summarize: the stockholders trust the corporation's board, and the board trusts its selected candidate. There are very few written requirements, most of the process is based on the judgment and experience of the board members -- which is why they're sitting on the board.
> ... years and years of strategic positioning, favors, and relationship building with people that matter.
That's accurate. But the bottom line is that if the candidate doesn't work out, the board's credibility evaporates -- that part of the process is also ruthless and unwritten.