Earlier quoted context omitted.
What did your response have to do with your quote? We can have the most growth ever as a civilization and still have the common person lose out. The Industrial Revolution also famously had a lot of people pushed into impoverished situations while robber barons or the highland clearing lords won out, despite the GDP of those respective countries increasing.
> What did your response have to do with your quote? The notion that growth can be unequal is not something that has changed. The anomaly was the post-WWII eventide regime. That doesn't mean there is anything natural about unequal growth. But if we want to return to that previous mode, we have to first understand what it was. And what it was was anomalous.
Someone called out that the common joe was doing worse off, you responded that gdp is higher than ever.
Are you making the claim that this is an acceptable state? Or are you making another claim?