Octopuses, crabs and lobsters to be recognised as sentient beings under UK law
191–200 of 704 posts
Re: Octopuses, crabs and lobsters to be recognised as sentient beings under UK law
#192Re: Octopuses, crabs and lobsters to be recognised as sentient beings under UK law
#193Earlier quoted context omitted.
I assume that Dr Jonathan Birch, Associate Professor at LSE’s Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, and his team of scientists didn’t encounter this insightful perspective when they reviewed “over 300 scientific studies” in order to arrive at their conclusions… In seriousness though, this comment is a prime example of speciesism. Even if it were true that these crustaceans were “basically bugs” how doe…
Does being an “antelope” somehow justify being torn apart and eaten by a lion? Yeah actually, it does because lions eat antelopes and humans eat lobsters. Nature doesn’t owe any being an existence devoid of suffering.
(Note: I had a lobster role for lunch two days ago, and I love them. However, these findings give me pause on eating them further.)
1. https://www.krugerpark.co.za/Kruger_National_Park_Wildlife-t...
Re: Octopuses, crabs and lobsters to be recognised as sentient beings under UK law
#194Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Octopi is not the correct plural. Octopi is not the most common plural, true. > Octopus is of greek origin, not latin. Octopus entered English from scientific Latin. In which the Greek plural was not used. (Lots of words in English fron languages other than their language of origin and have irregular English forms from their immediate source rather than their remote origin.) “Octopi” appears to be the earliest Engl…
Is the American pronunciation of “processes” (as in, rhymes with bees) also a hypercorrection?
..since when? I don't think I've ever heard "processees" before...
Re: Octopuses, crabs and lobsters to be recognised as sentient beings under UK law
#195Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's done to pigs, chickens, and cows is a terribly low bar to clear. I suppose lighting an ant on fire with a magnifying glass isn't cruel because it happens quickly. Personally how quickly an innocent being capable of suffering and happiness is killed doesn't factor into whether I call it cruel. Morality might be subjective, but the alternative requires accepting that needless, preventable death and suffering is…
The vegan argument is definitely a legitimate one, and not something I was trying to refute. A lot of meat eaters have these strange ideas about what is and isn't cruel (the classic being "hunting is evil but eating farmed meat is totally OK"), ostensibly based on reducing unnecessary suffering but also completely devoid of hands-on understanding of what actually happens. I will disagree with you on this point, thoug…
If you took two wild mammals and forced them to cohabit in a small area it would also very likely end in bloodshed.
Lobsters are known for having seasons in which they migrate. Even sources that say that crabs don't move a lot will describe that lack of movement as "will not exit a one mile area".
Re: Octopuses, crabs and lobsters to be recognised as sentient beings under UK law
#196Who really cares for Hank, Jaques and Bob...
Can't remember, is there a red herring in 'Finding Nemo'?
Re: Octopuses, crabs and lobsters to be recognised as sentient beings under UK law
#197Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Octopi is not the correct plural. Octopi is not the most common plural, true. > Octopus is of greek origin, not latin. Octopus entered English from scientific Latin. In which the Greek plural was not used. (Lots of words in English fron languages other than their language of origin and have irregular English forms from their immediate source rather than their remote origin.) “Octopi” appears to be the earliest Engl…
Is the American pronunciation of “processes” (as in, rhymes with bees) also a hypercorrection?
Re: Octopuses, crabs and lobsters to be recognised as sentient beings under UK law
#198Re: Octopuses, crabs and lobsters to be recognised as sentient beings under UK law
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nearly everyone has recent ancestors that lived on a farm and loved playing with the animals. Once they were old enough to connect the dots and later saw the butchering process, they remained omnivores for the rest of their lives.
Yeah some people don't care. But I think there would be FAR less meat eaters if they weren't able to avoid the carnage.
My uncle took me through his slaughterhouse when I was about 5. It was like a horror movie of screaming pigs, blood everywhere, heat, stench. Probably thought it would be fun for me to see, I don't know. I still love pork.
Re: Octopuses, crabs and lobsters to be recognised as sentient beings under UK law
#200Earlier quoted context omitted.
The vegan argument is definitely a legitimate one, and not something I was trying to refute. A lot of meat eaters have these strange ideas about what is and isn't cruel (the classic being "hunting is evil but eating farmed meat is totally OK"), ostensibly based on reducing unnecessary suffering but also completely devoid of hands-on understanding of what actually happens. I will disagree with you on this point, thoug…
As someone who grew up on a small beef farm in the UK but is also very picky about the source of the meat he eats, my personal anecdotal experience is that vegan or meat eater, the problem is that the vast majority of people have never been within 100m of livestock, and have zero comprehension of where their food actually comes from or how it arrives in their nice refrigerated trays. The cows on my dad's farm probabl…
There is no doubt that a good farm is better than a bad farm, but neither is particularly great if you're a cow.