Live data from Hacker News

Google is officially releasing Fuchsia OS, starting with a first-gen Nest Hub

9to5google.com

191–200 of 324 posts

Re: Google is officially releasing Fuchsia OS, starting with a first-gen Nest Hub

#191
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s true. But unfortunately all that baggage comes with lots of genuinely useful stuff too. Starting from scratch rarely works, unless you’re willing to put in a lot of time and effort, and are in it for the long haul, and people that want to start from scratch rarely are, and google doesn’t have a good track record in these matters either.

Normally I'd agree about Googles track record. But they HAVE to innovate in the android/mobile space. It would be their death as opposed to just dropping a random messaging app. And they did all the "from scratch" work. It would be short sighted to not let zircon at least have the potential to replace Linux. Apple vertical integration strategy recently took a big step forward and googles response may well be this.

What is zircon?

Re: Google is officially releasing Fuchsia OS, starting with a first-gen Nest Hub

#192
I'm almost more excited because of the proxy network affect this will have on microkernel popularization and alternatives like Dahlia OS (https://dahliaos.io/) that are looking to be independent distros of Fuchsia.

I understand peoples concern about a walled garden situation here, but I'd argue to only become worried if Fuchsia suddenly stopped being committed to openly and someone needed to maintain a fork. The working code for both the microkernel and the OS is all open source.

Re: Google is officially releasing Fuchsia OS, starting with a first-gen Nest Hub

#193
post #124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don’t want a remote-controlled smart (actually: dumb) home. You want a fully local solution, then you can add remote, internet-dependent functionality like alexa to it. That way your primary mode of control will always work.

This is how the Honeywell stuff seems to work, at least for my thermostat. As long as there is some local wifi, thermostat and controlling unit will work, even if you cannot contact them from the internet.

What happens if power goes out, the units stop working if WiFi isn't on a UPS?

This would definitely be a problem in cold climates where a dead furnace could lead to frozen and burst pipes.

Re: Google is officially releasing Fuchsia OS, starting with a first-gen Nest Hub

#194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm so done with this smart home stuff. "Alexa, turn on Living Room." "I'm sorry, I'm having trouble understanding now." I mean, yeah, I can toggle the light switch to get it to turn on, but then it gets screwed up and I need to go into the app to reset it when the internet comes back on. I don't even want to think about a smart thermostat. My dumb thermostat from 10 years ago let's me set timers which is all I reall…

You don’t want a remote-controlled smart (actually: dumb) home. You want a fully local solution, then you can add remote, internet-dependent functionality like alexa to it. That way your primary mode of control will always work.

Agreed. I've been really happy with Ikea's Tradfri line. It's all on Zigbee, works without internet and doesn't need an "Ikea account". However lights and blinds only for now, plus they have perpetual shortages.

Re: Google is officially releasing Fuchsia OS, starting with a first-gen Nest Hub

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It might make sense for a blind person with sighted family and friends.

Given that this describes my family and we have a first gen Nest Hub I expect to be able to soon report whether Fushcia is as accessible as the prior Linux stack.

Thanks. If you find that there's a regression in accessibility with this update, I'd appreciate it if you would email me (my email address is in my HN profile), to make sure I get the message even if I forget to check this thread, so I can help sound the alarm.

Re: Google is officially releasing Fuchsia OS, starting with a first-gen Nest Hub

#196
post #123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed. I'll add to that a healthy application of the Principle of Least Astonishment. If you have a light, there should be an obvious light switch nearby that turns the light on and off, and does so even if your home automation system is offline for whatever reason. "Smart" devices should, wherever possible, function as dumb devices if for whatever reason they can't be smart. There are a whole lot of devices that si…

Rhasspy is an easy to use open source, fully offline, suite for this with wake word detection and integration with home assistant.

I've never understood the desire to control systems by speaking to them in code words. Speaking monopolizes a shared channel, requires diverting your conversation, and is really slow.

For practically anything that involves using code words to tell the computer what to do there are better input methods, like physical switches, or purely automated.

This is slightly off-topic, but in your opinion what are some of the reasons people prefer to use voice input with code words over the other options ?

Re: Google is officially releasing Fuchsia OS, starting with a first-gen Nest Hub

#197
post #188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So, if I buy a device that runs Fuchsia (say, this Nest Hub), is enough of Fuchsia FOSS that I can run my own copy of it with e.g. a different UI and without Google services? This is true of Android devices by necessity as the kernel is GPL (bootloader locking aside); is it true of Fuchsia devices? As for bootloader locking, Google releases some Android devices with unlockable bootloaders. Can we expect the same of F…

It's not really true for Android either because the graphics drivers are mostly userspace and end up coupled with a lot of the vendor provided stuff. Fuchsia has no GPL so it's unlikely any of the driver source will be available to you.

[deleted]

Re: Google is officially releasing Fuchsia OS, starting with a first-gen Nest Hub

#198
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, now when Google's social enforcement algorithms label you an impediment, they can not only delete your YouTube video business and cut you off from your email, calendar, and Google Docs, they'll be able to turn the heat off in your house. The march of progress.

Five years ago, I would have thought you were trolling, but now you are right. With this scorched earth mentality exercised by the big companies, this is a very real possibility. What scared me quite a bit was Apple blocking all services when an Apple Card wasn't paid. That leads me to believe that Google could via an algorithm's decision disable a Nest thermostat during winter. I don't see IoT as anything but a risk…

> What scared me quite a bit was Apple blocking all services when an Apple Card wasn't paid.

I'm not trying to sway your opinion of Apple, but you should know that Mr. Curtis's Apple ID problem was discovered to be unrelated. Apple doen't disable Apple ID services because of missed Apple Card payments.

https://9to5mac.com/2021/03/03/apple-card-apple-id-unrelated...

Re: Google is officially releasing Fuchsia OS, starting with a first-gen Nest Hub

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the cause of this phenomenon is that most HN readers are not qualified to comment on Fuchsia, are ignorant of any and all facts about it, but are also compelled to comment. So you get this thread, and most threads here. Actual technical exchange between people who are both not obviously wrong is rare here.

Googlers thinking non-Googlers are unqualified to comment on anything seems like a fairly common theme to me. I really wonder what caused this kind of ideological entitlement. Was it a company culture that never said "no"? Was it the constant talk of how Googlers are just smarter and more brilliant than everyone else? Genuinely curious.

Ways to become qualified to comment on fuchsia are as simple as using it or reading its source code or docs.

Re: Google is officially releasing Fuchsia OS, starting with a first-gen Nest Hub

#200
post #193
post #124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is how the Honeywell stuff seems to work, at least for my thermostat. As long as there is some local wifi, thermostat and controlling unit will work, even if you cannot contact them from the internet.

What happens if power goes out, the units stop working if WiFi isn't on a UPS? This would definitely be a problem in cold climates where a dead furnace could lead to frozen and burst pipes.

The unit is event-driven, so no, you would just lose the ability to change its current programming. Regardless, it can be bypassed on the actual boiler heater, it's just a thermostat. It's a decent set of compromises, definitely better than anything going "no internet, no service".
Post reply on HN