Mozilla Lifeboat
191–200 of 336 posts
Re: Mozilla Lifeboat
#192Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think I found the solution, not basing yourself in one of the highest cost of living areas.
Mozilla hires devs all across the world, many in countries where developers are much cheaper than in the USA.
Re: Mozilla Lifeboat
#193Dope website and inspiring personal website: https://gkoberger.com/ Now I gotta work on my personal website.
> Try this on a computer! This site is way more interactive on a bigger screen… so check it out next time you're on your desktop!
Re: Mozilla Lifeboat
#194Thank you to the MDN and Servo teams for all their hard work. I wish you well for the future and hope you find a new gig soon.
Thank you to the MDN and Servo teams for all their hard work. Gutting the Servo team makes me wonder if management is going to move the rendering engine from Gecko to Blink. Perhaps the "Foxium" browser is "coming soon."
Not happening.
Re: Mozilla Lifeboat
#195Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Fix The Internet incubator doesn't look like very much money is involved. A $2500 stipend for participants, a top prize of $25,000, not that much money. Whereas layoffs of 250 people will save maybe $50 - $100 million a year. Of course, perhaps they will also cut future funding to this incubator, and it's just a different timing that they announce it.
They're paying their devs 200-400 grand a year? Jesus.
Mozilla’s layoffs were to get rid of the highly paid engineers, IMO. We have new talent coming in fresh and loose for a bunch less.
We also have a lot of cash in the bank. Mozilla is wealthy. CFO was asked to increase runway.
Re: Mozilla Lifeboat
#196Unrelated but what is this website made with? Looks really great.
Re: Mozilla Lifeboat
#197Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mozilla hires devs all across the world, many in countries where developers are much cheaper than in the USA.
So then where does the 200k - 400k come from? That salary would be outrageous for software devs over here in .nl, let alone for a non-profit.
Re: Mozilla Lifeboat
#198Earlier quoted context omitted.
Define "subject to". The policy explains when they give permission, but nothing it says has any effect on which situations need permission.
I'm not a lawyer, so I can't, won't, and don't need to answer that. However, people have had their pet projects shut down for way less obvious things than this.
Anyone can make a page with guidelines. If I say someone "photoshopped" an image then I'm violating Adobe guidelines. If "subject to" means I'm acting inside that scope, then I'm subject to them. But if "subject to" means they can do anything about it, then I'm not subject to them.
The way you're talking about the policy isn't making it clear which meaning you intend, but it's very important to distinguish between those meanings.
There's no need to be stubborn about clarifying what you meant. If you use a term, and someone asks what you mean by that term, "I don't need to answer that" is a very strange response.
Re: Mozilla Lifeboat
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mozilla hires devs all across the world, many in countries where developers are much cheaper than in the USA.
So then where does the 200k - 400k come from? That salary would be outrageous for software devs over here in .nl, let alone for a non-profit.
Re: Mozilla Lifeboat
#200Hey all, I built this last night as a resource for connecting Mozilla Alumni during this rough time. Mozilla laid off some truly amazing people this past year.... many of whom I worked with 10 years ago when I was there. As for why there's a red panda in the boat... despite the logo distinctly picturing a fox on fire, a "firefox" is actually the name for a red panda!
Props to even come up with the idea.