I don't know or care if mechanical keyboards increase my typing speed and/or precision, but they feel great and make me enjoy work more. If I can choose between a rocky desk and a sturdy one, I'll choose the latter, although they both do the job sufficiently well for my needs. A few months ago I got myself a tenkeyless with brown Cherry MX switches, and I am getting a second one now, because I can't be bothered to ty…
As a programmer I am disappointed with the lack of innovation in mechanical keyboards. They all look the same and have extremely similar layouts. What I could really use is some navigation keys to the left of the keyboard; maybe two columns of keys that are programmable; any innovation actually would be nice.
I recommend the Ergodox wholeheartedly. You can put arrows wherever you want. I have a layer always set up so I hold down a thumb key and the home row becomes arrows. As a touch-typist, I can move the cursor and select text (holding "shift") without moving my hand. I'm using Dvorak layout, but if it was Qwerty, my (right hand) home row goes from this:
Y U I O
H J K L
To:
Esc PgUp Up PgDn
Home Left Down Right End
It is totally natural now for me, I get frustrated being on a keyboard without this functionality.
Odd, I couldn't get that to format correctly, is there anyway to define a code block in hacker news markup?
I blame consumers for the lack of (reasonably-priced/available) innovative options in keyboards.
Everyone who notices my Ergodox thinks I'm the one who's odd, while I think anybody who would use a horrible membrane keyboard for 8 hours a day at work without yearning for something better is the one who is odd.