I've always found it ironic how companies like Coinbase are indirectly contributing to their own destruction with every passing transaction that's not purely based around Bitcoin. This is of course: assuming that Bitcoin gets as big as a lot of people think it will. If it does: their increased focus on centralization and traditional fintech services (which is completely incompatible with the philosophy behind Bitcoin…
As someone who used to work at Coinbase, hopefully I can shed some light on this. First of all, Bitcoin should not be seen primarily as a currency, but as a protocol. Therefore, bitcoin does not need to increase in value for it to be successful, and in the long term the price is irrelevant. Bitcoin can be used as a medium of exchange without regard to the price, and many people at Coinbase believe in this future (rat…
Anyway, that's irrelevant. If Bitcoin is for some reason the best protocol to be used, why would someone want to enrich the current holders of Bitcoin (of which I am one, by the way). Transferring value to Bitcoin necessitates buying Bitcoins from existing Bitcoin holders, enriching them for no reason. Why wouldn't a bank or other financial institution just start from a clean slate?