Live data from Hacker News

Jolla Phone (October 2026)

commerce.jolla.com

181–190 of 208 posts

Re: Jolla Phone (October 2026)

#181

Wanted to mention that Sailfish has a lot of closed-source components, especially UI-related, despite the overall marketing/"vibe" making it look very open. If anything, AOSP (Android) is more open than Sailfish. I don't think this has changed with Sailfish 5, see e.g.: - https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/sailfish-os-clarifying-claims... - https://docs.sailfishos.org/Develop/Open_Source/

They are (slowly) releasing more and more components https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/open-sourcing-proceeding/2468... https://github.com/sailfishos/sailfish-weather/ https://github.com/sailfishos/jolla-camera It's still more open than AOSP

> It's still more open than AOSP

Uh, no? How are you getting this idea?

This is the manifest file for GrapheneOS: https://github.com/GrapheneOS/platform_manifest/blob/17/defa...

It literally contains links to all the AOSP repos or GrapheneOS forks of them. You can clone these exact repos and build the OS from source. GrapheneOS provides instructions for it: https://grapheneos.org/build

Re: Jolla Phone (October 2026)

#182
post #110
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Google is so anti open it's the new Microsoft. You can unlock a Pixel's bootloader and install GrapheneOS. It would be highly ironic if the Jolla's was locked.

GrapheneOS seems to focus on privacy and security, not freedom.

This makes no sense. GrapheneOS is open source, while SailfishOS isn't. On top of that, GrapheneOS is much more secure.

Re: Jolla Phone (October 2026)

#183
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The irony you fail to realize, the differences listed in fact would be typical of a random Unix system in the 80s, where it's just a mountain of bad and random opinions stapled on top of a Unix system. Some random and half-baked libc? You got it! Some bizarre and overly convoluted greenfield filesystem structure? It's right there! Completely different and frustrating custom linker behavior? Yep! Everything I listed w…

Which system has better security from an end-user perspective? Only iOS comes anywhere close.

(Not on mobile but) Qubes OS does.

Re: Jolla Phone (October 2026)

#184
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Our desktop OSes are just incompatible with running untrusted software, and you're gonna want to do that. So you're saying people should only use walled garden closed source OSes? Sounds like tyranny to me.

No? AOSP is open source.

AOSP doesn't run on any phone without a ton of proprietary blobs.

Re: Jolla Phone (October 2026)

#185
post #122
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Huh. I really don't see the point of this, vs something like GrapheneOS. Edit: I'm well aware of the differences between typical Linux and Android (especially the security architecture!), and I'm willing to make some sacrifices in the name of FOSS... but only if it's actually FOSS.

If it has the "security" architecture of Linux (it's really more of a multi-tenant architecture) then that's a complete deal breaker. Wouldn't want it if it was 1000x faster/betterer than Android. Our desktop OSes are just incompatible with running untrusted software, and you're gonna want to do that.

> Our desktop OSes are just incompatible with running untrusted software

You should have a look at https://qubes-os.org

Re: Jolla Phone (October 2026)

#186

I wonder if humanity will ever go back to Nokia times small phones. If this phone was 50% smaller, I'd buy it in a heartbeat. I don't want to carry these huge bricks anymore.

Since NASA demonstrates it is possible to keep servicing software on a 50 years old hardware, traveling into space far far away, I want someone to buy software and original tooling rights for the Nokia 1100. Then prepare a firmware upgrade for the variant with WAP capabilities to replace them with a more modern, very optimized, stack and have it installed on the (millions of) remaining devices. Then deal with carriers convincing them to provide ad-hoc 2G CSD service. Finally setting up internet services for the puny device. One can always dream.

Re: Jolla Phone (October 2026)

#187
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Straight up conspiracy theories you're spreading here. Daniel Micay is Canadian, Dmytro Mukhomor is Ukrainian (he was literally conscripted into the Ukrainian army last year), and Khalykbek Yelshibekov is from Kazakhstan. > Micay is somewhat Russian-sounding too Sorry what?

I said "I actually couldn't find information on their nationality". Thank you for clarifying it.

Re: Jolla Phone (October 2026)

#188
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Straight up conspiracy theories you're spreading here. Daniel Micay is Canadian, Dmytro Mukhomor is Ukrainian (he was literally conscripted into the Ukrainian army last year), and Khalykbek Yelshibekov is from Kazakhstan. > Micay is somewhat Russian-sounding too Sorry what?

Any source for that, though?

Re: Jolla Phone (October 2026)

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My xperia 10 iii was 280€(+50€ OS) vs 500€++ for a pixel. But I hate phones. All I want is navigation, sms/call, signal, steam and firefox.

Ehm, a Pixel 9a is currently 349 Euro here (10a 399 Euro). Given that the OS is free, that's only a 19 Euro difference. For a much better camera, much better SoC, much better pretty much everything. Of course, if your goal is to run SailfishOS, there is currently not much of another option.

For 128gb without sd card support, you should specify that

Most people will fill that up in a glimpse without using cloud services

Re: Jolla Phone (October 2026)

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No idea you guys make up prices and devices when I made my choices years ago? All I can give you is my reasoning for picking it. Not giving google my money is always a plus in my book.

I had no way to know it was years ago, and I don’t consider buying used and flashing “giving Google my money”. Although it definitely enables the market for Pixels, they definitely don’t make much (if any) money selling Pixels, due to they’re being cheap-yet-flagship devices. It might even hurt Google for you to buy them and not capture all your data with their OS!

How are new pixels cheap?
Post reply on HN