Live data from Hacker News

Interest surges in top colleges, while struggling ones scrape for applicants

nytimes.com

181–190 of 410 posts

Re: Interest surges in top colleges, while struggling ones scrape for applicants

#181
post #146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For what it's worth, the things you call out don't seem to be the case in the Canadian public university that I attended, the University of Waterloo. > why are all degrees four years? UW offers three-year degrees. A four-year degree typically gets you an Honours Bachelor degree, whereas a three-year degree is a General Bachelor. On a resume it'd still be written as "B.A.", and the reviewer would have to know to inqui…

Wow. As a European I had no idea that Canadian education was so expensive. Was under the mistaken impression that it was largely free, like health care. Obviously much cheaper than the US - which is life destroyingly expensive. But the figures you cite are still pricey enough to exclude enormous numbers of people from higher education.

Bear in mind those are Canadian dollars, not the regular dollars, so the price tag is always going to be a little more confusing for the non-Canadians.

Re: Interest surges in top colleges, while struggling ones scrape for applicants

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why can't the skills necessary for being good citizens be taught in HS like they were back when going to college was rare?

Because the world has grown more complex and more education is required. It isn’t 1955 anymore.

How is the world more complex? What else needs to be taught today?

Re: Interest surges in top colleges, while struggling ones scrape for applicants

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And, worse, many office jobs that were satisfied with high school diplomas or 2-year degrees in 1980 were requiring a bachelors by 2000. Even when the degree was irrelevant. Seriously, data entry does not require a history degree. At one place I worked nearly every one in the data entry positions had a history degree, and all had 4-year degrees of some kind. (NB: Talking about in the US)

Requiring a 4 year degree for a job even if the major isn’t relevant doesn’t seem wrong to me. Maybe data entry is taking it too far? Maybe the data was really sensitive and complicated.

If the knowledge is not required for the job, what is the degree for? Is it a concealed/outsourced IQ test? Is it a concealed illegal minimum age requirement? Isit collective insanity?

I dare you to provide an explanation that is not illegal and/or deranged.

Re: Interest surges in top colleges, while struggling ones scrape for applicants

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "Because it has a large numbers of applicants. It's offer and demand." I suspect that's because these students are really buying prestige and a classics degree is the easiest option. > Something I've noticed and take this with a grain of salt as this is a sample=1 observation is that the better researchers (more publications, better funded labs) were generally also better teachers. This isn't a huge surprise to me…

> a classics degree is the easiest option I'm not sure I'd agree with that assertion.

You can substitute it for English, Communications, or Literature if you prefer.

Re: Interest surges in top colleges, while struggling ones scrape for applicants

#185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It causes inflation of job requirements, delays entry into careers, produces vast amounts of unnecessary debt and spending, promotes substandard graduate programs so people can be differentiated from the other history majors, and all because a high school diploma is considered worthless by most companies for their non-technical entry level positions.

Maybe the value of differentiating potential employees is worth it overall.

Size of their feet differentiates them too. How is it actually usefull?

Re: Interest surges in top colleges, while struggling ones scrape for applicants

#186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Only those that can afford the elite colleges (or be “smart” enough to get in) will be educated This is how it is today. The only difference is people are paying $40k+ x 4years to "be educated" but they're not actually learning valuable skills. > Yet somehow the common response to “college is expensive” is “get rid of it” instead of “make it less expensive.” We've already tried making it less expensive. Students ca…

Yet somehow the rest of the developed world manages to offer liberal arts degrees that don’t cost $50,000 a year. The trick is: don’t spend millions on football stadiums, don’t hire hundreds of administrators, and don’t offer student loans that are impossible to default on. It really isn’t that complicated, especially for the single wealthiest country in the history of human civilization.

I work for a consulting company which helps these struggling colleges. It's a difficult discussion to have. When you tell them that they are spending way, way more than they need to on administration, they usually 'ahem' and 'guffaw', especially when the implication is that the people in the room with you are part of the problem.

Re: Interest surges in top colleges, while struggling ones scrape for applicants

#187
post #7

I think this is generally a good thing. I believe there are really two positive things that can come out of going to college - either you get a name-brand degree that opens doors and gets your resume looked at, or you get useful skills that enable you to go down a particular career path (e.g. CS degree). Obviously in some cases it'll be both. The reality is it's really tough to make any case that a humanities degree…

There is so much broken with modern universities and incentives around pricing - why are all degrees four years? Why does a classics degree cost the same as a CS degree when the market value of a classics degree is basically zero? I wrote a little about it in the context of Lambda School, but it mostly applies: https://zalberico.com/essay/2019/04/08/lambda-school.html “The current university system in the US is a mes…

>Why does a classics degree cost the same as a CS degree when the market value of a classics degree is basically zero?

This is good. If degrees were priced based off of supply and demand economics then only rich people would be able to afford a CS degree.

Currently the bar for getting a degree is partly economics and partly intelligence. You can't get rid of economics completely but at the very least they keep prices egalitarian and allow for raw intelligence to be a huge factor in acceptance.

Re: Interest surges in top colleges, while struggling ones scrape for applicants

#188
post #7

I think this is generally a good thing. I believe there are really two positive things that can come out of going to college - either you get a name-brand degree that opens doors and gets your resume looked at, or you get useful skills that enable you to go down a particular career path (e.g. CS degree). Obviously in some cases it'll be both. The reality is it's really tough to make any case that a humanities degree…

> or you get useful skills that enable you to go down a particular career path (e.g. CS degree)

I so completely disagree. College/university is for education. If you want skills go to a trade school and save a truck load of money.

As an example lawyers and doctors don’t gain skills in law/medical school. They are required to slosh through forced internships for that.

CompSci graduates can’t tell the difference because the software industry isn’t mature. In all other professional career paths there is some combination of licenses or certifications. Many of those licenses require college as a prerequisite. It takes substantially more to become a truck driver than it does to be a software developer.

Re: Interest surges in top colleges, while struggling ones scrape for applicants

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That probably has more to do with 'greatness' as a product of the publishing system. (Meaning: it's great because it's published in a prestigious medium, not because the content is inherently superior) The next plato will likely be completely uncelebrated in these mediums, and will publish on an uncelebrated website or publisher.

To be fair, first Plato was born in aristocratic family and got best education possible at the time with private tutors. He definitely did not go to equivalent of 3rd tier university.

I didn't know that. But, I'm not surprised. It's entirely possible that Ted Kaczynski is the plato we're looking for.

Re: Interest surges in top colleges, while struggling ones scrape for applicants

#190

The article doesn't mention the demographic bomb in the US. 2019 births were 3.7 million. boomers were 4 million a year; would need to be 7 million to be proportional to the population then. 2020 and 2021m births are projected to be as low as 3 million due to pandemic nears. In addition to low births, student immigration has been severely restricted in recent years by federal policy. With both factors, the applicant…

This is absolute correct. Many state universities added campuses very actively back in the 1950s and 60s to accommodate the boomers who all wanted college degrees.
Post reply on HN