I don't understand why the big players such as Facebook and Google keeps insisting on using (appeals to) authority as a proxy to truth, when we have rules and systems for critical thinking. It seems to me that if the claims and stories in question could be re-posed (e.g. as falsifiable, logically coherent statements or arguments) the worst of "fake news" could be weeded out. The rest (and biases, etc.) would likely h…
Google and Facebook want to have their cake and eat it too: billions of users without having millions of customer service workers. What they're trying to accomplish, to my mind at least, would require the invention of general AI. Automatic content moderation sounds very close to a Turing test to me.
Facebook is rating the trustworthiness of its users on a scale from zero to one
181–190 of 197 posts
Re: Facebook is rating the trustworthiness of its users on a scale from zero to one
#182I wonder what the score would be if Facebook users were to rate its trustworthiness on a scale from zero to one.
Perhaps there is a reciprocal element. If Facebook appears not trustworthy to me, then I don't trust Facebook, and then probably I will appear not trustworthy to Facebook.
Re: Facebook is rating the trustworthiness of its users on a scale from zero to one
#183I'm curious how Facebook will distinguish between a fake news and a sci-fi essay I just posted on my blog. I'm guessing I'll be having close to zero visitors on my sci-fi blog.
Re: Facebook is rating the trustworthiness of its users on a scale from zero to one
#184So the bots will auto-post links to Wikipedia articles in certain groups and then 1 in 1,000 will be on the target groups with the fake news. This will become like gaming Google rank.
Re: Facebook is rating the trustworthiness of its users on a scale from zero to one
#185Archived copy without GDPR nag screen: https://web.archive.org/web/20180821143120/https://www.washi...
Re: Facebook is rating the trustworthiness of its users on a scale from zero to one
#186I'm here for the Black Mirror 'Nosedive' comparisons.
Re: Facebook is rating the trustworthiness of its users on a scale from zero to one
#187Interesting. I wonder if this includes lies told in private messages?
Re: Facebook is rating the trustworthiness of its users on a scale from zero to one
#188I’d rate Mark Zuckerberg a zero.
Re: Facebook is rating the trustworthiness of its users on a scale from zero to one
#189Could we change the title to "Facebook is rating the trustworthiness of its users"? The zero to one bit is irrelevant and obvious to programmers.
Re: Facebook is rating the trustworthiness of its users on a scale from zero to one
#190Earlier quoted context omitted.
> their knowledge of the fact is going to be based on what third-party sources they trust (including those acting as fact checkers), which is tightly correlated with viewpoint. But that's true of nearly everything. On anything controversial, users will generally vote based on what they like to believe, and such a system of ranking news stories or posters of news stories would never be reliable.
> But that's true of nearly everything. Yes, that's my whole point: the claim made that users flag content bases on ideology rather than factual disagreement is essentially impossible to be justified, since perception of facts and ideological viewpoints are deeply intertwined.