Firefox has a pretty neat feature I discovered recently: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Contextual_Identity_Projec... It lets you run multiple sessions in one window, where each tab belongs to a specific session with separated cookies and such. I've got a bunch of tabs where I'm logged in to Facebook, another set where I'm logged in to Google and the rest of them where I'm not logged in to either. Of course they c…
Facebook can track your browsing even after you've logged out, judge says
181–190 of 208 posts
Re: Facebook can track your browsing even after you've logged out, judge says
#182Firefox has a pretty neat feature I discovered recently: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Contextual_Identity_Projec... It lets you run multiple sessions in one window, where each tab belongs to a specific session with separated cookies and such. I've got a bunch of tabs where I'm logged in to Facebook, another set where I'm logged in to Google and the rest of them where I'm not logged in to either. Of course they c…
Re: Facebook can track your browsing even after you've logged out, judge says
#183Firefox has a pretty neat feature I discovered recently: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Contextual_Identity_Projec... It lets you run multiple sessions in one window, where each tab belongs to a specific session with separated cookies and such. I've got a bunch of tabs where I'm logged in to Facebook, another set where I'm logged in to Google and the rest of them where I'm not logged in to either. Of course they c…
Chrome has profiles for this as well. You can also use the PrivateInternetAccess addon which proxies all traffic for that profile alone, and a canvas blocker, in a dedicated Chrome profile. Font fingerprinting is still possible, but beyond that there is no way to associate that profile with anything else.
Re: Facebook can track your browsing even after you've logged out, judge says
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could you share a link to this site?
I suppose it was https://panopticlick.eff.org
Re: Facebook can track your browsing even after you've logged out, judge says
#185Re: Facebook can track your browsing even after you've logged out, judge says
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't your IP address plus cookies enough to track you?
Yes, but they can be trivially blocked or discarded. My main point is that no advanced fingerprinting tactics can be used so the simple means work in the case of most site-breaking things. Privacy Badger eats CDN cookies - that's actually one of its main features, so it will prevent this kind of thing quite nicely without breaking websites.
Re: Facebook can track your browsing even after you've logged out, judge says
#187Earlier quoted context omitted.
Like Google Street View already does.
I don't think they were forced. Google is based in the U.S. where it is legal to photograph people in public, yet Google still blurs the faces of those on sidewalks. That and things like license plates seems to me to be them preemptively trying to appease privacy concerns so that support to censor them legally doesn't form.
Re: Facebook can track your browsing even after you've logged out, judge says
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's disingenuous because it reduced a social issue to that of particle physics. It's like me assaulting someone and saying "wow, they sure couldn't handle a collection of atoms exerting momentum on their face", or calling a tornado "some gusts of wind", or other ridiculous things.
That's exactly what the parent commenter means. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong
Re: Facebook can track your browsing even after you've logged out, judge says
#189That's not all. In NY state, they ruled that can artist can take pictures of you in your home through your windows: https://fstoppers.com/photojournalistic/supreme-court-rules-...
Re: Facebook can track your browsing even after you've logged out, judge says
#190The article or the judge (not sure which) suggests using incognito mode. While this will keep browsing history private for a particular session, it's only effective locally. Tracking from the server is still possible either through being logged in or through browser fingerprinting, which is surprisingly accurate. Here's a good demo which uses fingerprinting to show how ineffective incognito mode is: http://www.nothin…
How does a user defend against this, without resorting to a nuclear option like Tor?