Live data from Hacker News

Knitting bullshit

katedaviesdesigns.com

171–180 of 221 posts

Re: Knitting bullshit

#171
post #11

Am I to believe that those 700K+ downloads are organic traffic? Who's listening to all this stuff?

I occasionally put on a (human-made) podcast for the word-sounds rather than the content. I can imagine others do the same without caring whether it is human-made.

If the sonic quality of a human voice is what you're seeking, then I imagine a generated voice will still be less appealing, no?

Re: Knitting bullshit

#172

Wow I’d never have expected Kate Davies to show up on Hacker News. I think it’s important to understand her background a bit when she talks about knitting as a matter of life and death. She was a scholar of 18th century literature before she suffered a stroke young[0]. She focused on knitting as a means of recovery and never looked back. She built a business and a community and attributes a lot of her physical and me…

> Not their job; their whole personhood I hate so much that while I read your reply this particularly phrasing was grating to me. There's nothing wrong with it, and I have no doubts you, whoever you are, wrote it. What annoys me to death is that a perfectly fine language construct is tarnished to a point that a mere glance reflexively caused me to wince, and I had to actively interpret it as fine.

Interesting, sounds like a similar experience to my reading of this reply

The root comment brings insight and value and stakes out a human position. I don’t see a need to snipe from the hedges

Re: Knitting bullshit

#173

Increasingly, my reaction to AI-generated content of basically all types is simply a deep, resonant sadness. The growth of AI feels a little like losing a limb - there is an initial shock of sadness, an initial dose of loss, an initial sense of what has been taken away. But then for months and years afterwards, the daily occurrence of some other little humdrum experience, and only at the moment of the encounter does…

It feels like I will forever mourn the totally self-inflicted loss of the Internet. I feel like I will never get over it, so much so that I wish I had never experienced its (brief) moment of brilliance. I feel sorry for my younger self for thinking it was here to stay.

Kagi SmallWeb still has a lot of interesting stuff like the old internet

Re: Knitting bullshit

#174

Increasingly, my reaction to AI-generated content of basically all types is simply a deep, resonant sadness. The growth of AI feels a little like losing a limb - there is an initial shock of sadness, an initial dose of loss, an initial sense of what has been taken away. But then for months and years afterwards, the daily occurrence of some other little humdrum experience, and only at the moment of the encounter does…

Have you lost a limb?

Re: Knitting bullshit

#175
post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To me it had, in a way, the opposite effect - I started appreciating non-AI content more. Good art has something that is difficult to reproduce if one isn't already an artist who is just using AI as a medium - it's intentionality. Take for example Floor796[0]. Every little detail counts and while you could use AI to generate single characters or even the whole thing, you'd inevitably find details which have no reason…

Yeah, but you have to realize we are on the losing side of this war. The armies of bullshit now have an incredible advantage that actual art can never have. At least in the past, there was some equilibrium. Bullshit was cheaper to make than art (or any other quality product), but now it has become infinitely cheaper to produce, and much more expensive for us to separate from the bullshit. Think about this for a momen…

The simple answer is every single AI podcast is the chaff. Everything this company makes can just be ignored.

Re: Knitting bullshit

#177
post #92

it's really disheartening that so much youtube content is now AI generated.

At least they don't get many views. Not sure why the system suggests them? Maybe they could have an "AI crap" feedback button to warn others?

Re: Knitting bullshit

#178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Not their job; their whole personhood I hate so much that while I read your reply this particularly phrasing was grating to me. There's nothing wrong with it, and I have no doubts you, whoever you are, wrote it. What annoys me to death is that a perfectly fine language construct is tarnished to a point that a mere glance reflexively caused me to wince, and I had to actively interpret it as fine.

Interesting, sounds like a similar experience to my reading of this reply The root comment brings insight and value and stakes out a human position. I don’t see a need to snipe from the hedges

I think maybe they were saying that their personal AI slop detector had produced a false positive on "whole personhood", and they felt sad about that? Or perhaps I'm missing it.

Re: Knitting bullshit

#179
post #175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, but you have to realize we are on the losing side of this war. The armies of bullshit now have an incredible advantage that actual art can never have. At least in the past, there was some equilibrium. Bullshit was cheaper to make than art (or any other quality product), but now it has become infinitely cheaper to produce, and much more expensive for us to separate from the bullshit. Think about this for a momen…

The simple answer is every single AI podcast is the chaff. Everything this company makes can just be ignored.

All they need to do is keep changing the creator tags. They won't give up without a fight. Are you willing to give up all new content creators?

Re: Knitting bullshit

#180
post #68
post #11

Am I to believe that those 700K+ downloads are organic traffic? Who's listening to all this stuff?

I listened to a podcast a while back (human authored I'm pretty sure) about low-quality gutter level streamer content and how popular it is, speaking of personalities like asmongold and a vast number of even worse imitators. This content is made by humans but is pointless grindingly stupid filler spiced with a dash of obviously performative offensiveness. You're basically listening to a complete loser (or someone LAR…

The vast majority of people tuning into those kinds of slop streams are not really active listeners. It's more akin to turning on the radio while you work/clean/perform some other task that doesn't require strict focus or attention, with the added benefit that you can personally interact with the streamer (chat) when you have attention to spare. But I'd wager most viewers never directly interact or even pay much active attention to the stream at all.

I wouldn't be surprised if the same dynamic is playing out with these AI slop podcasts.

Post reply on HN