Live data from Hacker News

Google Podcasts to shut down in 2024

techcrunch.com

171–180 of 236 posts

Re: Google Podcasts to shut down in 2024

#171

We have gone full circle. I started with Google Music which had both music and podcasts at the time. Then they took podcasts out of Google Music and made me install a second Google Podcast app just to listen to my podcasts. Then they shut down Google Music and forced me to move to YouTube Music. Now they are shutting down Google Podcasts and integrating that back into YouTube Music. Like WTF.

Google Music / Play was the best thing they built imho. Was really sad to see it go.

Re: Google Podcasts to shut down in 2024

#173

Google drastically needs portfolio management. The qualifications for this position should be very low, some very basic common sense would do. I suppose they can get away with all of this because the concept of competing for a customer doesn't really exist at Google. They can toy around without any consequences because they have a money printer. Also, at Google's current size, anything producing less than 1B in reven…

I think part of the problem is, almost all their products have been free... launched as free and remained free without clear monetization plan, except to grow userbase.

There was no strong disincentive for pulling the plug on products without paying customers.

For the past few years, they've been trying to 'correct' that and in the process pissing everybody off.

Re: Google Podcasts to shut down in 2024

#174

I really like the simplicity of Google Podcasts, it does one thing and pretty well. I'm also a Spotify user and despise have podcasts mixed with music, so bloated and clunky (also Spotify performance isn't good), music and podcasts are different usecases for me, I'm on different mood. I don't want to jump to YouTube Music, and the last time I did a research, I can't find a simple Podcast app that is free, simple, ad-…

I think the point about separation of Music and Podcasts is an important one for me as well. I really don't like mixing the two, they have two different use cases imo. Drives me nuts how much Spotify pushes podcasts when I just want to listen to some tunes.

I’ve suffered through it just like you. I recently reinstalled Overcast after using Castro for quite a while. But, I’m still not completely satisfied with any of these apps.

Re: Google Podcasts to shut down in 2024

#175

Google drastically needs portfolio management. The qualifications for this position should be very low, some very basic common sense would do. I suppose they can get away with all of this because the concept of competing for a customer doesn't really exist at Google. They can toy around without any consequences because they have a money printer. Also, at Google's current size, anything producing less than 1B in reven…

Google is an advertisement company. Not a tech/app company. Google creates free apps solely on the incentive to gather and sell your data.

Re: Google Podcasts to shut down in 2024

#177
post #168

I really like the simplicity of Google Podcasts, it does one thing and pretty well. I'm also a Spotify user and despise have podcasts mixed with music, so bloated and clunky (also Spotify performance isn't good), music and podcasts are different usecases for me, I'm on different mood. I don't want to jump to YouTube Music, and the last time I did a research, I can't find a simple Podcast app that is free, simple, ad-…

Minor question: Why not use the PWA using a different browser engine? Since it’s in its own window anyway. I hear Safari is gaining them this year though I never touch Safari. Edge has it, and Chromium probably does right? I wholly agree however, that mixing music and podcasts in one app is stupid though! If by any chance you’re an Apple person, I’d recommend Overcast. It’s a measly $10 or so per year for ad-free but…

Sure, I can answer your question :) Tes, I tried to use YouTube Music with Chrome since it supports PWA installation, but it wasn't a good experience, the browser get synced with my Google Account and I don't like it, also my keyboard keys to change volume and tracks didn't work (with the Spotify app they work), maybe now they work, I know that PWA support in Chromium was pushed and evolving a lot recently.

Maybe I should try other chromium-based browser just for that, but also don't feel to have logged in my Google Account in other browser (if YTM has a desktop native app will be similar haha but IDK), hope Firefox desktop at some point support PWA installations. And maybe I'm old, but for products that I interact all day (spotify, figma, slack) I just like native desktop apps detached from browsers, even if they are Electron apps which are essentially a webapp wrapper.

About the Overcast suggestion, I'm a Windows/Ubuntu/Android person, I guess Overcast isn't for me, but I'm willing to pay $10/year for a product like Google Podcasts, I will look for products soon.

Also, Google Podcasts is free and ad-free, I never even see a promoted podcasts or something like that. But than can be one reason why Google shut it down. Google Keep is similar, simple, free and ad-free, I love it, hope they don't shut it down!

Re: Google Podcasts to shut down in 2024

#178
post #166
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's an utterly strange response - it's a difference between UI just moving somewhere else and losing service availability. It sounds like you just want to rant?

Podcasts are already in YTM though. Nothing’s moving. They’re killing off a product, plain and simple. Whether that’s no big deal or a big deal is up to every individual. I am assuming anybody who wanted to use YTM for podcasts already is, and it’s not a stretch to say people will probably be annoyed.

YTM has podcasts only in the US, though.

This announcement is quite frustrating elsewhere, since we have no idea how good or bad YTM is for Podcast

Re: Google Podcasts to shut down in 2024

#179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's amazing how incompetent they seem in this area. They even shut down another podcast app before your journey began, called Google listen. Luckily, although you might want Google's proprietary music player to access their subscription content, there's absolutely no reason to use a Google podcast app. I am a fan of Antennapod[0], which is available on F-Droid. [0] https://antennapod.org/

> t's amazing how incompetent they seem in this area You may be surprised at how competent they look internally. If I were a betting man, I'd say each of those transitions went into a promotion/performance packet. I count at least 3 product teams competent at developing podcast features, and were likely rewarded for it.

The only successful products I can think of from Google that were entirely of their own making are Google Search, GMail, and Chrome. Their other successes all came from acquisitions, like YouTube, Maps (KeyHole), Docs (Writely), Android, etc. They deserve some credit for their cultivation and maintenance of these products, but they did not create them.

Re: Google Podcasts to shut down in 2024

#180
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the point about separation of Music and Podcasts is an important one for me as well. I really don't like mixing the two, they have two different use cases imo. Drives me nuts how much Spotify pushes podcasts when I just want to listen to some tunes.

Spotify thinks if they can get you into Podcasts, which they don’t have to pay a dime for, it will improve their bottom line, since you (probably) can’t simultaneously listen to music that they do have to pay for. Kind of a funny motivation to enter the podcast market, but probably a good business move, as awkward and annoying, and seemingly irrelevant to their brand and core competency as it is.

That's a fascinating way of looking at it that I've never thought about before. So basically Spotify is considering cost per minute of music vs. podcasts? That's a believable explanation for the counterintuitively high price they paid for acquiring popular podcasts like Joe Rogan (which they know loyal viewers users will reliably watch for hours each week, during which time they won't be streaming Taylor Swift songs on repeat).

It's also interesting because the normal optimizations like caching don't apply to licensing fees. At first I was going to suggest that they can cache frequently played songs to save cost, but then I realized that has no impact on royalty fees derived from playtime.

Post reply on HN