Live data from Hacker News

Intermittent fasting from dawn to sunset induces anticancer response

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

171–180 of 388 posts

Re: Intermittent fasting from dawn to sunset induces anticancer response

#171

"Dawn to Sunset" laughs nervously in Scandinavian So we can't eat anything in the summer, as the sun doesn't really go down? :) On the other hand, we can gorge ourselves during winter.

With or without water? The latter sounds quite like Ramadan fast.

Re: Intermittent fasting from dawn to sunset induces anticancer response

#172
post #20
post #13

By “no drinking”, do they really mean no drinking plain water? 14 hr stretches are doable but it’s interesting to find your body improving while becoming dehydrated.

“Dry fasting” is a thing, but it seems most people recommend against it. Not sure what the added advantage is for avoiding zero calorie water consumption.

I mean, there's the religious "high". But I think the goal behind it is to allow one to feel how those who are much more unfortunate than us feel on a hot summer's day and so on.

Re: Intermittent fasting from dawn to sunset induces anticancer response

#173
I don’t think you should be looking at studies when it comes to how you eat, you should be focusing on how you feel, observing your own body and possibly talking to a doctor. I had a really big problem with acid reflux a while back after I stopped drinking alcohol. I visited many gastrologists and most of them offered little to no help, most only prescribed me drugs which was in my opinion not a solution. I finally meet with a gastrologist that did an endoscopy and basically sat me down and said that if I wanted to get over my acid reflux I needed to eat really light over the next four months, no fruits, no tomatoes, no pork or beef only poultry, no fried food, no greasy food, and the list went on. I did the diet, had a few cheat days because it was hard, and my stomach recovered. After the four months I reintroduced certain foods and started learning about how my body reacted to them. I also realized that I feel a lot better with a full stomach than with an empty one. My point is we all have slight different bodies and that while studies are great, sometimes it just good to study yourself and how you feel. On a side note, if you’re one of those people fasting to be healthy yet haven’t cut out drugs, alcohol and tabaco out of your life then do that first, it is the first step to good health.

Re: Intermittent fasting from dawn to sunset induces anticancer response

#174
I wonder how this is related to the so called "mediterranian diet"? I mean, the advantages for the mediterranian diet could perhaps at least in part be attributed to the times at which people eat rather than the exact food they eat?

My experience with Spain et al is that they are hot during the day and locals tend to eat a lot late at night and very little during the day.

Re: Intermittent fasting from dawn to sunset induces anticancer response

#175
post #2

Welcome to Ramadan!

This is not just pertinent to Ramadan. Every 2 days in the month , there is this Hindu thing of Ekadasi ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ekadashi ). Each of these depending on the month have a presiding deity! The rules are simple , the day before should be a light meal , on Ekadasi dawn to next day dawn (about 36 hours in all) fasting. On Dwadasi , break this fast by first having water , meditation and then a light m…

When I was in Nepal I talked to a guy who said he was not eating that day "to balance the body". The way he spoke about it made it seem like it must be a normal practice there which everyone understood and was aware of.

Re: Intermittent fasting from dawn to sunset induces anticancer response

#177
post #45

- Anticancer - Anti-diabetes - Anti-aging - Reduction in body mass index, waist circumference - Improvement in blood pressure

It makes sense to fast temporarily in order to "jolt" the body into action (reduced external input activates internal compensation processes) as our genetics have ancient embedded protocols developed to push through resource restrictions. If not for your listed reasons - do it to knock the rust off of safely stored emergency equipment. I've noticed that once you get past the first "hump" of hunger pangs, famish subsi…

> I've noticed that once you get past the first "hump" of hunger pangs, famish subsides into the background, and I'd imagine it is at this point where the metaphorical "adrenaline" dosage is injected by nature to make available the bodies reserve energy to get through inevitable temporary nutrient deficiency back in our hunter-gatherer days.

I haven't personally fasted as such in this manner but was always quite fascinated and am quite fascinated by how various Muslim colleagues and friends are able to do it during the summer with 45 degree heat and so on. All of them say that the first two days are the toughest while the rest of the month of Ramadan seems basically the same as the rest of their lives. It does put into perspective as to how much of our "hunger" is psychological than resource needs.

Re: Intermittent fasting from dawn to sunset induces anticancer response

#178
post #34

The "research" is politically motivated, it is thus garbage. Especially considering that it would be dangerous to publish the result if it were to show the other way, not that they would want to publish it. Besides, not having even a drop of water for longer than 12 hours during summer is dangerous, not only to fasting people themselves but to the society as a whole since they drive cars and they have higher rate of…

> Besides, not having even a drop of water for longer than 12 hours during summer is dangerous, not only to fasting people themselves but to the society as a whole since they drive cars and they have higher rate of fainting during that.

It's clear that many in the world do exactly that. It might be interesting to see a study similar to above as to whether accident rates increase during Ramadan.

Re: Intermittent fasting from dawn to sunset induces anticancer response

#180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Drip coffee is horrible, so I understand wanting sugar. I moved to black by buying a mocha pot and aeropress. It's a whole different coffee experience, milk and sugar not necessary.

I have every coffee making gimmick from the chemex to the aeropress and I guarantee you would fail a blind test on which one is which, or if the cups of coffee are even different. I mean, what exactly is the mechanical difference of putting hot water through coffee grounds and a filter that differs when you do it in an aeropress vs. a dripper? And you think you're tasting enough of a difference to say one is horrible…

The uncontrolled variable you don't mention in all this is the coffee beans themselves.

If you start out with mediocre beans, they'll tend to taste more or less the same as other mediocre beans, no matter how they're ground and brewed.

If you take good beans, grind them within a few days of roasting, and brew them within a few hours of grinding, you will start to notice a very significant difference in taste, regardless of brewing method.

Post reply on HN