Live data from Hacker News

DeepSeek API Pricing Update

api-docs.deepseek.com

161–170 of 201 posts

Re: DeepSeek API Pricing Update

#161
post #147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They did release the weights and there are many providers https://openrouter.ai/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731#provid... Deepseek's official API has a pretty bad privacy policy so I would assume businesses avoid them in any event

it says they actively train on your data

Yes - unusually (uniquely?) bad for an official API.

Which is a real bummer because it’s otherwise solid with excellent caching.

Re: DeepSeek API Pricing Update

#162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah it feels like a very different model. I don’t try to fill up Apple/Google cloud drives to 1TB because then I’d have to clean up when I need space. I don’t bother trying to maximize my Audible subscription because there’s only so much I can listen to in a day. Even with my other AI subs that have monthly credits that don’t carry over, I just don’t have the interest or time to burn the credits. But my Claude Max s…

And there's the rub. Firing off the task produces the dopamine hit, signaling you're doing something, but if you never read the output...are you really doing anything at all?

I don’t know, I get dopamine hits from sharpening my handplanes and using my Veritas routers on some scrap, but I just can’t empathize with getting a dopamine hit from using a bot. Especially with how bad Opus 5 has been.

I am however going to fire off a half assed prompt when the marginal cost is zero, even if I don’t use it (which is par for the course, I probably throw out two thirds of anything the AI writes anyway be it code or prose).

Re: DeepSeek API Pricing Update

#163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes. I focus on pricing software and I’m a bit baffled why frontier models are pushing tokens. It’s a race to the bottom, and the bottom is unlimited use for a flat monthly rate. Granular pricing (tokens, minutes, etc) is pretty anti-customer generates less revenue than customer value-based subscriptions (why SaaS is such a good business model)

I've always been curious about who works on software pricing. Do you guys hire actuaries for this type of work?

[deleted]

Re: DeepSeek API Pricing Update

#164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes. I focus on pricing software and I’m a bit baffled why frontier models are pushing tokens. It’s a race to the bottom, and the bottom is unlimited use for a flat monthly rate. Granular pricing (tokens, minutes, etc) is pretty anti-customer generates less revenue than customer value-based subscriptions (why SaaS is such a good business model)

I've always been curious about who works on software pricing. Do you guys hire actuaries for this type of work?

Microeconomists. It's just a question of demand modeling. If you want to learn here is the bible: https://www.sup.org/books/business/pricing-and-revenue-optim...

Re: DeepSeek API Pricing Update

#165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's worth keeping in mind the model doesn't keep a running memory. Each time its instantiated, it begins from its release state - so from its perspective (if it had one) the current task would be the first stop after posttraining. Perhaps the only stop. Though of course you're talking about data centers, and romanticizing them rather than the AI itself.

Why do they do it this way? Because dogfooding is harmful to the model? Is this implying there's no benefit in having the model train on itself?

> Is this implying there's no benefit in having the model train on itself?

There are various theories around model collapse when you train on too much AI generated data (that's not for distillation).

Re: DeepSeek API Pricing Update

#166
Not yet, but in the end high quality tokens are a commodity market. Every optimization to increase inference efficiency will be universally rolled out. The 'hyperspenders' will run into demishing returns unless regulatory capture succeeds.

Re: DeepSeek API Pricing Update

#167
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

200% increase over practically free is still practically free

It mostly hurts people in countries with weak purchasing power. DS was the main game in down for them. Personally, I don't think we've seen the total end of dirt cheap LLMs, it's just a frontier lab doesn't want to be in business of serving half the world.

Thank you for bringing that up, such a rarity for this place to remember the other 80% of the world.

As someone from just such a country, DeepSeek 0731 was the first time I seriously started using an LLM for coding. All previous attempts were useless or ridiculously expensive.

Can't say the old prices felt "free", but it was affordable if you're careful with your cache hit rate.

The new pricing probably pushed it into the unaffordable territory for tasks where you can do without it. Probably will try opencode go if they don't also follow suite, or will have to go back to wetware.

Re: DeepSeek API Pricing Update

#168
post #147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They did release the weights and there are many providers https://openrouter.ai/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731#provid... Deepseek's official API has a pretty bad privacy policy so I would assume businesses avoid them in any event

it says they actively train on your data

we should get discounts for that!

Re: DeepSeek API Pricing Update

#169
post #151
post #57

Interesting to see that peak hours are work hours in China, night in the US and Europe, and also morning in Europe. So Deepseek's customers are mostly domestic.

Yeah I saw complaints about this under their twitter announcement, that they're giving discounts to the rich foreign customers and screwing their own people.

That's one way of interpreting supply and demand curves, I guess :/

Re: DeepSeek API Pricing Update

#170
post #149

Ever since I started using flash, it has slowly crept up to be my default for everything. It is at the good enough state for a fraction of everything else that's out there.

Have you compared it to Luna? I was using Flash for small tasks before, then switched to Luna when they dropped the price. The benchmarks show that Luna is significantly faster, but I think those are very complex tasks for which you'd probably want a bigger model anyway. (e.g. Sol is much faster than Luna at the same tasks.) So I'm wondering if there's any difference for smaller tasks, or if they're basically matched…

The Luna price dropped the day before a massive update to Flash (0731 update). GP may be referring to that version.
Post reply on HN