Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have been hearing the same for the last 20 years, if not longer, and yet the consumer computer remains strong.
Absolutely no one said consumer computing was going away in 2005. What were they supposed to be replaced with?
Are consumers just tech debt to Microsoft?
161–170 of 241 posts
Re: Are consumers just tech debt to Microsoft?
#162I feel like the culture at large has shifted from doing what's exciting to doing what's safe, from actor's point of view.
Re: Are consumers just tech debt to Microsoft?
#163No, consumers are not tech debt to Microsoft. Yes, Microsoft is shifting away from consumer technology. The difference is Microsoft is squeezing every last drop of profit from consumers on their way out. That’s not debt, that’s an asset. In 25 years Microsoft will be similar to Oracle. Maybe they’ll have investments in some consumer brands, but largely they will be selling to enterprises and governments.
The term is 'cash cow'. Something you milk for cash rather than grow or improve
I am going to have to suspend my objection to the HN usage of MBA as a term of abuse because of where I learn the concept......
Re: Are consumers just tech debt to Microsoft?
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple is at least in part operating like they are a fashion brand. Functionality and usability are secondary to looks. Both in their devices and their software. It's hard to argue they aren't successful with that. It probably helps that Microsoft has also abandoned usability, just for very different reasons
I think the HN crowd and the public at large have different ideas of usability. The "I want to save the file on my computer that I own" resonates with us. But there are a lot of advantages to a mobile like experience. There's no viruses, you never lose files, apps don't lock up your device, and so on. The problem isn't really the experience being something like devices as a service. It's that the providers are a rent…
Re: Are consumers just tech debt to Microsoft?
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
Absolutely no one said consumer computing was going away in 2005. What were they supposed to be replaced with?
What are they going to be replaced with now? You still can't do anything actually useful on a mobile device. You need an actual computer to get anything done besides dicking around playing games or scrolling through apps.
Re: Are consumers just tech debt to Microsoft?
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you complaining that Apple is releasing computers that are fast, quiet and with a ridiculous long battery life that are well built as “not functional”?
Apple has famously been form over function almost since their inception.
Re: Are consumers just tech debt to Microsoft?
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
> VSCode (polished, fast, ...) and Explorer (paleolithically slow, In what world is VSCode fast when its startup time is multiples of Explorer (which had in recent news decided to preload itself to mask that issue) and they are the result of exactly the same fundamental shift from native to web native
VSCode starts up the same as any other IDE, and is responsive and snappy when using it. Explorer starts up about 100 times slower than any other file explorer, and is exceptionally while using it too.
Re: Are consumers just tech debt to Microsoft?
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
> VSCode (polished, fast, ...) and Explorer (paleolithically slow, In what world is VSCode fast when its startup time is multiples of Explorer (which had in recent news decided to preload itself to mask that issue) and they are the result of exactly the same fundamental shift from native to web native
The competition is IntelliJ, which can be slow as molasses.
Re: Are consumers just tech debt to Microsoft?
#169Re: Are consumers just tech debt to Microsoft?
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple has famously been form over function almost since their inception.
This is true, with the caveat that their function is also best in class. And I mean yeah, they make gorgeous devices, but even if they were ugly id still choose them because they also work better than any alternatives.
However, its definitely true that Apple prioritizes looks is function.
We're just currently in a generation where it ceased to matter for the most part, because Apple Silicon has made the previous tradeoffs basically meaningless. But that's not because Apple started to prioritize function, technology has just gotten good enough for their design philosophy to no longer hamper it significantly