Original journal article (apparently not linked to in the Bloomberg piece): Association between cannabis use disorder and schizophrenia stronger in young males than in females (May 4 2023) https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/psychological-medici... Interestingly, the journal article doesn't bother to mention how cannabis use disorder (CUD) is defined; however, Bloomberg's description "frequent use despite negativ…
This is especially lame when they have access to the Danish population registry with its rich metadata and very large _n_, and could so easily control for a lot of confounds, by doing within-family comparisons. (Spoilers: the correlations would shrink a lot if you compare siblings or better yet, twins. Tip to the authors if you're reading this: 'controlling for parental history of schizophrenia', for something as rare as schizophrenia where so few are diagnosed but will still be carrying heavy liability, doesn't control for genetic factors.) They could have done some actual science, and contributed some knowledge; instead, all they did was waste everyone's time by contributing yet another meaningless highly-confounded piece of research to add to the pile of other equally useless correlates on SCZ/marijuana, a pile which did not need increasing. What a waste.