161–170 of 301 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Who will buy the bosses' shit if everyone is unemployed and can't afford it? Companies can't stay afloat by just buying from each other.
GPTs with access to budget
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hey everyone makes mistakes when coding, even LLms. There’s two approaches I use, I’m sure there are more. * Do multiple completions and, filter the ones that successfully run, and take the most common result. * Do a completion, if it fails, ask the Llm to find and correct the bug.
This sounds like reducing the temperature with more steps
It could be inaccurate with high precision - like a bow that consistently undershoots, and you would have a harder time trying to correct it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think this is "terrifying" to 3D artists any more than github copilot is terrying to us haha, I'm not sure why we engineers have this tendency of imagining every other industry as being populated by superstitious peasants from the dark ages who fear new tools. In my experience the vast majority of people are excited about GPT including artists.
I don't know, maybe I am one of those "superstitious peasants from the dark ages who fear new tools", but I'm increasingly terrified of GPT-4 and future iterations of it as applied to the industry I work with (i.e. software). It does seem to threaten to suddenly eliminate all the interesting parts of the job, a good chunk of openings, and to significantly reduce salaries for the openings that remain - all at the same…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think this is "terrifying" to 3D artists any more than github copilot is terrying to us haha, I'm not sure why we engineers have this tendency of imagining every other industry as being populated by superstitious peasants from the dark ages who fear new tools. In my experience the vast majority of people are excited about GPT including artists.
my main issue is the people making hiring and budget decisions aren't 3D artists, they're managers. my work might be objectively better than GPT's, but is that going to matter when my boss compares the cost difference and decides GPT is 'good enough'?
I'm glad it is not just me who thinks I need to "thank" chatGPT or encourage it, e.g.: "Great, now do .... " "Great, now do ... ".
When super intelligent AI gains power, I want it to know I've been a good boy.
"The generated code might not always be correct. In that case, run it again lmao" is the best documentation I've read all week.
By the way, is this a possible vector of remote code execution? Probably yes, by definition, but how could somebody exploit it to do some harm to the user of that Blender instance?
Something like `Some text blabla.Hidden text` And when asked for something specific, GPT would output the hidden text.
So you could push code onto github with an exploit along to common usecases.
EDIT: found it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35224666 Anti-recruiter prompt injection attack in LinkedIn profile (twitter.com/brdskggs)
I'd love to add this capability to our SaaS product, but I've waited for OpenAI to make GPT-3.5 or GPT-4 available for fine-tuning. (Cramming an entire API into the prompt does not seem feasible, not even with support for 32K tokens.)