Earlier quoted context omitted.
Briefly: It could be, but that would mean reclassifying the airplane. Maybe think about it like anti-lock brakes. Cars without ABS can be driven safely in many/most circumstances, but most drivers are accustomed to ABS. (This is necessarily a limited analogy) Also, there are government requirements per aircraft type, and removing this system would change the aircraft type, triggering a significant amount of required…
It cant, the forces have to linearly increase per FARs, so MCAS has to be a thing, same type certificate or not.
Boeing has temporarily stopped making 737 Max airplanes
161–165 of 165 posts
Re: Boeing has temporarily stopped making 737 Max airplanes
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
It cant, the forces have to linearly increase per FARs, so MCAS has to be a thing, same type certificate or not.
Ah, that's the first time I've heard that. I'm certainly not an expert, I've just read/watched a number of reports.
The departure from reality in this case is pretty severe:
1. There were severe issues with pilot's performance on both flights.
2. Airline maintenance is culpable in the Lion Air flight.
3. MCAS is required irregardless of what type certificate is used.
4. Boeing's "new problems with the 737" are not as much a result of faults previously ignored, but new issues created by reassessing the risk factors related to those systems.
5. The 737 MAX is not aerodynamically unstable.
6. The 737 MAX issue has brought to light severe issues in the aviation industry that may require retraining many pilots in the industry or being way more aggressive with refresh training (also see the Atlas Air crash recently).
Re: Boeing has temporarily stopped making 737 Max airplanes
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
What metrics would you consider when it comes to aircraft safety?
Flying on airframes that have been sufficiently validated by regulatory bodies and have a history of not killing passengers.
Even the best airframe will go down if poorly maintained or their pilots aren't experienced and properly rotated.
Re: Boeing has temporarily stopped making 737 Max airplanes
#164According to the article Boeing has halted production, but this leaves the door open to producing them again in the future after design updates. I predict they'll try to rename the model and fly it again after making changes and certifying. That being said, I never want to fly on a 737 Max or whatever they plan to rebrand it as.
The 737NG is out of production, and Airbus currently has something like a 5 year backlog of A320 orders. The only other direct competitor is the Comac C919. Boeing has already made about 1000 737MAXes. The 737MAX is going to be a significant part of the global airline fleet whether you like it or not. There will be many routes where the 737MAX is the only aircraft flying that route. I think it's fairly unlikely that…
No they're still rolling off the line for the military Poseidon and Wedgetail programs
Re: Boeing has temporarily stopped making 737 Max airplanes
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
I worked at a help desk when Windows ME came out. As I recall, the most salient difference I found between it and XP was that they removed a bunch of tools that I had come to rely on for diagnosis, troubleshooting, and just generally understanding what was going on under the hood. I guess it was ostensibly better, but I never did feel as comfortable working with an ME box. With that in mind, yeah, Windows ME sounds l…
But ME came out before Windows XP..