Earlier quoted context omitted.
Toggles, buttons, sliders, look like they could be on a white plastic physical device. Flat for sure but more skeuomorphic than macOS in its current state imo.
To me the elementary theme looks like a slightly more flat/matte version of the Mavericks version of Aqua. It might not be in style these days but I like it a lot.
Elementary OS 5.1 Hera
161–170 of 193 posts
Re: Elementary OS 5.1 Hera
#162Wow - this looks great. Keep up the great work - I will have to find time to install and try it over the slow holiday period.
Re: Elementary OS 5.1 Hera
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have the exact opposite experience - the microphone doesn't work, everything is incredibly slow, my SO is buying a Windows 10 licence this christmas. It's a shame, the user was just fine with Cinnamon on Debian 5 years ago, but that machine and software is no longer good enough.
If you can get a hold on a Windows 7 or 8 license, you can still upgrade it for free to Windows 10. Might be worth it if they're heavily discounted.
Re: Elementary OS 5.1 Hera
#164While I use i3 on archlinux, I think elementary OS looks great and is a great alternative for less tech savvy users. I am very grateful to the elementary OS community for it existence. One other alternative could be Cinnamon.
Ease of use and UI preferences have nothing to do with tech saviness.
Re: Elementary OS 5.1 Hera
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does elementary still return their release codename instead of the base ubuntu release for `lsb_release -cs` in shell?
Yes, because elementary OS is not Ubuntu. In the past, we carried newer versions of GTK or other core libraries, so pretending to be Ubuntu would actually do more harm than good. However, we have added an `--upstream` or `-u` flag to lsb_release like other Linux-based OSes to point to an upstream release if the downstream release is not supported. I believe this has been adopted for installers of tools like Ruby and…
Re: Elementary OS 5.1 Hera
#166I love the idea of having a Linux distro that emulates macOS, but I see no point in copying only the vague look, when it still differs in basic functionality, like using different keyboard shortcuts. I don’t understand why (based on semi-thorough googling in the past) it is not possible to change all shortcuts to be like macOS (cmd-c instead of ctrl-c etc.)
As much as elementary clearly takes inspiration from macOS, the developers have been quite clear that they're not trying to make a mac clone. You can agree or disagree with that mission, but it is what it is.
Re: Elementary OS 5.1 Hera
#167Serious question time. What benefit will I get from running something like Elementary over Ubuntu? Forgive my ignorance, but honestly the whole OS looks like it's just a fork of Ubuntu with a couple of swapped in applications, and a GTK3 theme on top of GNOME trying to make it look like a ten year old version of macOS. I hate to be so negative, but the "new greeter" they are showing looks like something from Windows…
I think it's worse than other Ubuntu distros as they lock it down "for my own safety". But for parents and other people not too good with computers it's a good windows alternative
Now the only problem is when they find out there's a new version I'll be spending Christmas week in NY updating a whole bunch of computers.
Re: Elementary OS 5.1 Hera
#168I've been using Elementary as my main OS for ~4 years now. No complaints. Everything runs smooth and nice. However, since they build on the latest Ubuntu LTS release the Kernel is slighlty outdated and may not support the latest hardware. This can be fixed easily using a little tool called "ukuu" that will install a newer kernel for you https://github.com/teejee2008/ukuu
What a spectacular hack! Instead of going around your package manager in such a spectacular fashion, why not just switch to a distro which provides an up-to-date kernel along with associated packages. For example, how does this program handle proprietary Nvidia drivers?
Re: Elementary OS 5.1 Hera
#169Re: Elementary OS 5.1 Hera
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why do you hope so? Vala is a decent language which let's users build Gtk applications easily.
Because most people aren't going to learn yet another language for the privilege of being able to contribute to something.
Plus, most people don’t know most languages, so no matter what you choose, most devs have a language barrier. Vala, again, is very easy to pick up — certainly easier than C or C++ and probably easier than Java/C#/D.