Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: How to leave a startup when you own a third of it?

news.ycombinator.com

161–162 of 162 posts

Re: Ask HN: How to leave a startup when you own a third of it?

#161
post #159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh but they can. If you start a company with two other founders and agree to a 1/3 split each, or 33,000 shares. After a month you get bored and decide to let them make it a success, quit the company and tell them to wire you your third when they finally succeed. In that case they can issue 1 million new shares immediately to themselves, and with very little tax consequence. It's a one month old startup, worth close…

True. In that regard it's also fair.

I think that's the crux of it: is it fair?

If it's fair, you're in the clear. The diluted partner might be unhappy, and could even sue (but would hopefully lose), but at least objective observers with good information about what went down would be ok with it.

If it's not fair, you open yourself up to lawsuits you may be unable to win, and your reputation as a fair dealer gets damaged, perhaps permanently, and people will think twice about working with you in the future.

Re: Ask HN: How to leave a startup when you own a third of it?

#162
post #160
post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> ... adding to it the potential of losing all your equity because you had a falling out with the CEO makes it almost not worth the trouble. That's why you set up terms up front. If, when they decided on a 33/33/33 split, they also decided on a vesting schedule, they wouldn't have this problem. The OP would get some percentage value based on math, from contract terms they all agreed to when they started.

Exactly. They should have had this worked out from the start, just in case. "Irreconcilable differences" isn't the only thing that can go awry, and a vesting schedule protects everyone. If you're losing all your equity after over a year of work just because you had a falling-out with co-founders (or investors), you didn't do your homework.

You JUST said, that the terms won't matter, the vesting won't matter if you leave, since it is a red flag. You implied that "doing your homework" may not protect you, since even vested equity of an ex-cofounder might be frowned upon.

So which side are you arguing on?

Post reply on HN