Live data from Hacker News

Majority of debtors to US hospitals now people with health insurance

theguardian.com

151–160 of 202 posts

Re: Majority of debtors to US hospitals now people with health insurance

#151

I have good insurance and I have unpaid medical bills for the following reason: 1. Visited a doctor 4 months ago, got a bill 3 months after the visit, paid it, then got a surprise second bill, which I have put off paying because I need to find time during my work hours to follow up on with the hospital + insurance. 2. Didn’t get bills for some of the visits I made in the last 3 months. 3. Insurance randomly denied cl…

This was us for my wife's pregnancy and delivery. Some of the bills were denied by Cigna for things that were covered according to their book. So we had to fight that. Cigna can take months to reprocess claims, which basically puts you into default with the hospital while you wait for the insurance to pay out for services that were supposed to be covered. We've done this after every medical event because Cigna always…

Private equity is destroying our country, but that’s a longer conversation.

Re: Majority of debtors to US hospitals now people with health insurance

#152
post #109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The politicians against healthcare reform are well-known Who are they specifically?

The answer is the majority of the Republican party and their electorate, but just saying that will get you a barrage of downvotes on HN and other similar forums. We get the system we deserve..

Well we got Democrat-led reform and it’s arguably worse.

Re: Majority of debtors to US hospitals now people with health insurance

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But why is done that way? Lots of freelance chefs move between restaurants but the bill is always between the restaurant and the people who dine there.

Because historically doctors were in private practices. I still am, as an anesthesiologist. Many of the surgeons I work with are also private. So, since neither of us is employed by the hospital, we do our own billing. If we were hospital employees, we could indeed do unified billing. That's a better analogy; your chefs are expecting to be paid by the restaurant, so it collects the bill. I am not paid by the hospital…

And historically, grocery suppliers are not owned by the grocery store I go to, but it would be completely batshit insane for me to go to Kroger, buy a bag of potatoes, and then three weeks later get a separate bill from some potato farmer for it.

Re: Majority of debtors to US hospitals now people with health insurance

#154
post #39

Buried midway down, they mention that the commercial health plans available to people without conventional employers (Obamacare) can (and routinely do) set deductibles as high as $9,450. And that’s in addition to the premium-which, in New York City for example, starts at $618/month for the very worst plan for an individual. Sure, that’s subsidized for lower-income households — but who among those has a spare $10K lyi…

I’m unemployed in NYC right now - so, zero consistent income. I’m one of those people with the very worst marketplace health plans. Here’s what I get for $640/mo (with a $120 tax credit, oh boy!): - Visits to my general practitioner (but not so fast! no diagnostic tests or ANYTHING else - those are 100% out of pocket until my $9,000 deductible is met) - Pregnancy care (it’s currently a biological impossibility for me to give birth)

Everything else is entirely out of pocket until my $9,000 deductible is met. My coverage is basically a $6,000 guarantee that I won’t be completely bankrupted if I get run over by a garbage truck and live to tell the tale. Otherwise, it’s completely useless. Something’s gotta give.

Re: Majority of debtors to US hospitals now people with health insurance

#155
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been getting those separate bills recently and it's driving me nuts. For one small out patient procedure I have received bills from the hospital, the doctor, the anesthesiologist, anesthesiologist nursing company, and a random surgeon I have never met that the doctor asked in for a 30 second consult (I know how long the procedure took) while I was under. Seriously considering ignoring some of these whotf-are-you…

there is a company where you can submit your bills if you suspect overbilling. they have professional coders on staff and they will find fraud or overbilling on your behalf and also sue the hospital too medical billing fraud is a serious offense that can get the hospital in quitw hot water and they leverage that

What's the company? I've wanted to outsource dealing with medical billing games a few times.

Re: Majority of debtors to US hospitals now people with health insurance

#156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One thing my mom has been dealing with recently is where the insurance EOB and the bill differs substantially. My mom called the hospital to ask for an explanation and poof the bill is magically lowered by a several hundred dollars. How the heck is this not criminal fraud? Why are people allowed to simply bill whatever they feel like it, and why is my mother getting 'balance billed' for random amounts? They're still…

https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/no-surprises-unders...

From what I’ve experienced, having an open dispute doesn’t prevent healthcare providers from sending you to collections and permanently ruining your credit.

Re: Majority of debtors to US hospitals now people with health insurance

#157
post #109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The politicians against healthcare reform are well-known Who are they specifically?

The answer is the majority of the Republican party and their electorate, but just saying that will get you a barrage of downvotes on HN and other similar forums. We get the system we deserve..

I generally vote Democrat, but there is no American political party putting serious support toward a sensible healthcare system.

Re: Majority of debtors to US hospitals now people with health insurance

#158
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What do you expect me to do about it? I live in a reliably blue area and it's Republicans who are blocking things like a single-payer system. So why did single payer healthcare fail in Vermont and California? European countries the size of Maryland manage to run their own universal healthcare systems. Why can’t states where democrats outnumber republicans 2:1 do the same?

Because you'll get the same issue as with the homeless, people from other states will come over to mooch on the better services. This has to be handled at a national level in order for it to succeed.

If they're homeless, they aren't 'paying' into a single payer system, regardless of it being at the State or Federal level. People that pay little to no taxes 'mooching' off the taxpayer funded services is exactly the concern of many that oppose universal healthcare.

Considering many large companies self-insure their employees' healthcare, it seems unlikely that simply expanding the scope of who is covered is going to make the whole plan work.

Re: Majority of debtors to US hospitals now people with health insurance

#159
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A single-payer system doesn’t seem like a magic fix to me at all. At best, a single payer could , at least in principle, wield enough market power to improve the overall system. Just look at Medicare. Medicare has enormous market power, but it uses that power in more or less absurd ways and does not optimize patient outcomes or its own expenditures particularly effectively.

It sure works in a bunch of other countries. I don't think there's anything special about the US that it wouldn't. And it enables things like optimizing for patient outcomes that can't be achieved with private insurance.

The thing that is unique to the US is the level of corruption. Politicians are 100% beholden to corporate interests and nothing else. America’s dominance is entirely reliant on industry, so nothing can be done to upset the big corps.

Re: Majority of debtors to US hospitals now people with health insurance

#160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Single payer was killed by the healthcare provider lobbies, not the insurance lobby. Doctors have waged a war against single payer anytime it has been suggested for over a century. The power the doctor and the hospital lobbies wield to sway opinion utterly dwarfs that of the health insurance industry.

There are multiple reasons I can imagine why that might be, but I would love to see some citations for this so I have solid data I can confidently adjust my world view with. My opinion is that insurance companies are middlemen who too frequently rob patients & providers alike, and I would expect any reasonable legislation to include provisions to ensure that being a doctor is still financially attractive. Coming arou…

Ultimately, it's about pay. This covers some of the history:

https://www.kqed.org/news/11902591/why-do-so-many-doctors-op...

That people believe healthcare providers, where the vast majority of the $4.5 trillion in healthcare spending ultimately goes, are just barely getting by and that they're being robbed by insurance companies (~5% of spending) should be ample evidence of how powerful they are.

Never mind that private insurance reimbursement rates are higher than Medicare's and even Medicare's rates are double that of every other advanced developed country.

Post reply on HN