Live data from Hacker News

Skirting U.S. sanctions, Europeans launch trade mechanism for Iran

reuters.com

151–160 of 315 posts

Re: Skirting U.S. sanctions, Europeans launch trade mechanism for Iran

#151
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> and is now in a nuclear bomb program for the grace of god I have no love for Iran what so ever, but opposing them for having a nuclear program while not opposing the US or any other country who also has nukes, is so extremely hypocritical. I'm so astonished to see that argument over and over again.

It isn't hypocritical unless you see both types of government as equivalent - liberal democracy vs theological roughly democracy.

Yes, it's still hypocritical.

You can, and in my opinion should, criticize Iran for a lot. For example for being a theocracy like you mention. But saying "you cannot have nukes, but we can" is still very much hypocritical.

Re: Skirting U.S. sanctions, Europeans launch trade mechanism for Iran

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

??? Your link says in 2013 the U.S. was near its neighbor Canada on per capita carbon emissions. That's still double the EU. But that's also 6 years ago; the gap will have closed somewhat.

And Canada reflects the emission levels of rich Americans. Canada is no roll model on carbon emission.

Canada is a huge frozen country most of the year. Comparing warmer countries to Canada doesn't make sense emission wise.

Re: Skirting U.S. sanctions, Europeans launch trade mechanism for Iran

#153
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> considering their ongoing Brexit One of the big campaigns for Leave was that the EU was dampening our ability to trade with the rest of the World. I guess maybe not then?

One of the realisations from after the result was Leave had no plan at all. Nothing admissible or written. I'm sure Rees Mogg had a plan, but it wouldn't have won votes, so that's staying in his head. The Scottish Independence referendum had a plan running to hundreds of pages. Good bits and bad bits, but a good few people had put thought into what came next. Leave had a bus, with a slogan.

> Leave had a bus, with a slogan.

Not just any slogan, a slogan that was blatantly misleading to say the least.

Re: Skirting U.S. sanctions, Europeans launch trade mechanism for Iran

#154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Free trade is a socially acceptable excuse Brexit voters can use to mask the real reasons they voted to leave. As is sovereignty.

I don't get the ridicule the argument about sovereignty is exposed to. Of course that is one of the most important discussion within the European Union. You can argue that external forces decrease the room for maneuvers for a single nation. Just as you can argue that member states have the tendency to fiercely guard sovereignty anyway and did so in the past. Nothing to say against that. But to say that sovereignty is…

Setting aside the fact that the UK has a veto over pretty much any important EU decision...

> Of course that is one of the most important discussion within the European Union.

Is it? Why?

> Nothing to say against that.

Why should the sovereignty of the UK be paramount? Why not the sovereignty of (for example) London, Cornwall or Scotland?

The UK is a mix of geographically-close former countries, inhabited by people with different backgrounds who speak different native languages and used to be at war with each other.

I fail to see why the UK should have any greater claim to sovereignty than the EU or a subsection of the UK...

> Most new laws are enacted by the EU in most member states.

No idea if that's true, but I do know that the vast majority of laws enacted by the EU are done so because it is more beneficial for the UK (and other member states) if the EU enacts them as opposed to each EU state enacting their own version. Much simpler when it comes to trade etc.

Re: Skirting U.S. sanctions, Europeans launch trade mechanism for Iran

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Free trade is a socially acceptable excuse Brexit voters can use to mask the real reasons they voted to leave. As is sovereignty.

People dislike the idea of the UE turning into United States of Europe with a Soviet style super-government.

People also dislike the idea of the EU forcing every child to eat a kilogram of french cheese every morning before school.

Luckily, neither is likely to happen and - even if it were proposed - the UK has the power to veto it ever happening.

assuming we are in the EU. if we're outside, we just watch and weep.

Re: Skirting U.S. sanctions, Europeans launch trade mechanism for Iran

#156
post #120
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We see enough people profiting from these wars to wonder how much global conflict is manufactured. I hope we stop buying in. We, the people, are pretty powerless here. Lobbyists and elected officials have too much power and election cycles are too far apart. So even when recent American military action gets relatively low support from Americans [0], neither congress nor the president has any motivation to do anything…

You’ve forgotten how to protest. I recall you guys getting pretty upset over some tea with Britain. Seriously as long as folks are content at home the politicians won’t give a damn about you. Go march in the streets en mass and things will slowly change.

>Go march in the streets en mass and things will slowly change

The Afghani and Iraqi Wars engendered some of the largest protests in human history. They are still ongoing.

In America, when you march in streets, they make laws so cars can run you over

Re: Skirting U.S. sanctions, Europeans launch trade mechanism for Iran

#157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Iran is a radical islamic theocracy that hangs gay people and exports terrorism to the rest of the Middle East in the form of Hamas and Hezbollah. They also want to wipe Israel from the map and are trying to build nuclear weapons. We need more sanctions, not less.

Just going to pick on a few things you mentioned: The Iranian people overthrew the shah who ruled for ~38 years and whom the US supported, and seemed to choose theocracy. (I say "seemed" because I'm sure there are two sides to the story. From the little reading I've done, it seems there was significant support for the theocracy.) They now hold elections, though I don't know how free of meddling they are. So they've g…

I can also highly recommend Fisks books (I have The Great War on the shelf and refer to it often), but I would also like to add Robert Baers books, he was a CIA case officer who speaks farsi and is pretty knowledgeable about things. I think it is also highly worth reading up on the original coup that installed the Shah in the first place, it was essentially the first coup the British used their newly trained (everyone knows the OSS became the CIA, but who did the OSS learn from? The Brits) American orgs as a proxy in an overthrow.

Which is one of the reasons moves like this by the UK are interesting; much of the current American sentiment towards Iran was shaped by the Chatham House group in the first place.

Also I sat down and actually read all the IAEA reports in 2010 or so and besides the mossad planted laptop fiasco, all indications were that Iran was not seeking weaponization or even virtual breakout mode, and I have yet to see any good evidence to the contrary other than claims of "secret evidence".

Re: Skirting U.S. sanctions, Europeans launch trade mechanism for Iran

#158
post #136
post #87

A "deal" that has near-zero value for both parties where the EU is more trying to save face by showing it is "independent" while trying to not anger the USA anyway by applying other sanctions. IMHO this is a pretty weak move from the EU, and shows that there is no clear driver behind the EU wheel after the souring of US-EU relations.

Lol, what? This deal is entirely designed to cut US out the loop of international payments, one step at a time. It is extremely valuable to EU to able to conduct oil payments with Iran directly in Euro, without the US being able to say no.

Did you read the article? "The European trade vehicle was conceived as a way to help match Iranian oil and gas exports against purchases of EU goods. However, those ambitions have been toned down, with diplomats saying that, realistically, it will be used only for smaller trade, for example of humanitarian products or food." So effectively the EU-Iran trade deal is just a diplomatic move rather than a real trade deal. Also EU companies do not want to risk getting sanctioned by the US by getting into any trade with Iran.

Re: Skirting U.S. sanctions, Europeans launch trade mechanism for Iran

#159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> for Israelis act in self defense Are other people/nations also allowed to 'act in self defense', or is it only Israel? > Now get fucked. Well, I guess you won the argument.

Yes, but half the world isn't actively trying to destroy most people/nations. And yes I do recognize it must suck ass to live in Gaza and I feel for them, and hope for a better future where their lives don't suck ass. I have no idea what to do about it though. I know it's inconvenient for Europeans and progressives who think they can just lift the blockade and stop operations in Syria and everyone will live happily e…

> half the world isn't actively trying to destroy most people/nations

True, including Israel.

You do realize that the occupation and abuse of Palestinians by Israel is what drives those Arabs that hate Israel, right? It's a rallying call, if you will.

As for genocidal rhetoric, it's been done both by Israeli neighbors and Israel itself.

As for military might, Israel is clearly on top.

> I do recognize it must suck ass to live in Gaza and I feel for them, and hope for a better future where their lives don't suck ass. I have no idea what to do about it though.

> I know it's inconvenient for Europeans and progressives who think they can just lift the blockade and stop operations in Syria and everyone will live happily ever after

As for Syria, is a sovereign country that you have no right to operate in, nor do you have the right to constantly violate Lebanese airspace.

How do you expect other countries to respect you, when you don't even respect international law?

As for Palestinians, there's always the rhetoric that they will never become peaceful etc. but how about you stop thinking of 'Greater Israel' and stop building illegal settlements as a first step? You can't continue jacking their land and somehow come to an agreement with them.

As for Gaza, yes, lifting the blockade, at least for essential supplies, lifting fishing restrictions, not targeting civilians and perhaps sponsoring targeted programs to build infrastructure there etc. would help. Stop sniping nurses and journalists as you did with the great match of return, that would be nice.

Build some goodwill, allows Gazans to leave and study abroad, sponsor some targeted infrastructure projects...

> but when that filters through my ears it becomes "we don't give a fuck if you live or die."

> Why should I care about the opinions of people who don't give a fuck if I live or die?

For my part, I absolutely care for you to live, but it could be said that it is what comes out of Israel is to my ears as if you don't care whether Palestinians live or die indeed.

There's much talk about their violence etc. but from what I've studied, it is driven by desperation. There's no prospects there, no future, no joy, no nothing. When there's such a situation, resisting what they, (and the international community btw), see as occupation is pretty much the only thing that occurs to many of them.

I realize the issue isn't simple, but as I said, outreach and show of goodwill go a long way. Stop building settlements for one, enforce security in their areas from settler attacks as well, build infrastructure, come to the table and most importantly stop dreaming of 'Greater Israel' and you may get somewhere.

Re: Skirting U.S. sanctions, Europeans launch trade mechanism for Iran

#160
post #14

[flagged]

You seem to be propagandized out of your mind. The current Iranian regime is there BECAUSE of Western meddling, it would not exist otherwise. You also need to realize that the Gulf states sponsor terrorism to a larger degree and are our allies, so it's not about that. The U.S. supports 75% of the world's dictatorships. It simply wants control of Iran's natural resources, same goes for Venezuela, where the opposition…

For someone accusing others of being "propagandized out of your mind" you seem rather uninformed.

>"The current Iranian regime is there BECAUSE of Western meddling, it would not exist otherwise."

The original Iranian Revolution was a reaction to Western meddling and policies. The current regime is there because of the consolidation of power of the theocracy. The executive branch is actually subordinate to the Supreme Leader and the Supreme leader controls the military. Iranians don't get to vote for the Supreme Leader - that's a position for life. The Islamic Republic borne out of a referendum in 1979. There hasn't been a meaningful referendum since. 60% of the population is under the age of 30, many of which are not interested in living in an Islamic republic.[1]

>"The U.S. supports 75% of the world's dictatorships."

Please provide a single citation for this statistic. This is an absurd statement.

>"It simply wants control of Iran's natural resources, same goes for Venezuela,"

The US doesn't need Iran's oil, neither does it need Venezuela's. The US has been a net exporter of oil for a while now. The US shale boom has been in effect for years.[2]

[1] http://time.com/4046788/iran-revolution-nuclear-deal-youth/

[2] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-12-06/u-s-becom...

Post reply on HN