Earlier quoted context omitted.
You must be from the US.
I am from the US and buy bags of sugar. What else does sugar come in? If not bags? I don't think I've ever bought sugar in something other than a bag.
Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
141–150 of 179 posts
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#142> Thats’s comparable to a single strand of spaghetti holding up about 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar What an odd example. A mid-sized car would have been much clearer.
While I am totally with you on the bags of sugar, I am also unsure of the significance of a single thread of spaghetti! Is that by weight? By volume? Are we comparing uncooked (brittle) or cooked (flexible)? Even so, spaghetti strand is not known for strength or tension resistance even when considering the weight/size/volume. I can't at all understand what this comparison is meant to visualize for me, so it is obviou…
It's holding up 3300 pounds. Pounds is a unit of weight.
> Even so, spaghetti strand is not known for strength or tension resistance even when considering the weight/size/volume.
That's...kinda the point? We have something we don't give two thoughts about (slug tooth) comparable in scale to something not known for strength or tension resistance (spaghetti) holding up to something ginormous as if it's magic. Clearly, we should study slug teeth more!
Imagine if a strand of spaghetti can hold 3300 pounds. It's not possible with spaghetti but with slug teeth, it is! Now imagine the possibilities!
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
Aren't there significant differences in allowed depth (from minimum of 2m to maximum of 3m)?
Good catch. We've run into a problem somewhere along this journey of comparing the compression strength of a snails tooth to the tensile strength of a spiders web.
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#144> Thats’s comparable to a single strand of spaghetti holding up about 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar What an odd example. A mid-sized car would have been much clearer.
Mid-sized European or American car?
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#145> Thats’s comparable to a single strand of spaghetti holding up about 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar What an odd example. A mid-sized car would have been much clearer.
Must be a british thing?
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is it De Cecco though or some inferior brand like Barilla?
Barilla is fine and I will fight you
Then they made some very slopjob AI ads. Superick but I keep buying them. :|
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#147Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#148Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#149Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
OP is talking about a football field, not a soccer field. It’s a common joke in America that things have to be measured in football terms. In the “for what it’s worth” department, Brits called it soccer too. I have no idea why they swapped to football recently.
What's the size of football fields in use for the Federation of International Football Associations (FIFA) World Cup happening in USA (among others) right now?