> 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar Ah, but how many one pound bags of concrete could it hold?? Why bags of anything? This is a poor way of communicating weight. Just say "a modern passenger car".
because as a reader, bags of sugar are more engaging to me than bags of concrete.
Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
71–80 of 179 posts
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#72> 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar Ah, but how many one pound bags of concrete could it hold?? Why bags of anything? This is a poor way of communicating weight. Just say "a modern passenger car".
I noticed that too. I feel like this might be a new way of laundering AI written text, just provide the quote verbatim as if the they believe it was actually written by the author.
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry, but that's what 14 (standard) pickup trucks of yak hair was invented for.
ok but what color is the yak hair?
White, of course; that way the statisticians can dye them any color they want. But for ultra high precision I do recommend the Boeing system. But be sure to use the older models, before private equity firms replaced all the metal parts with zipties. If you can't find a quality Boeing (plausible), consider 1.1 Blue Whales (tricky).
fnordpiglet was being deliberately humble with the decimals. It's accurate down to the semi firkin. Not to be confused with a quarter Tod.
Ignore the redundant bike shed comment, as that fits precisely 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar. Anyone with a bike should know that.
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#74> Thats’s comparable to a single strand of spaghetti holding up about 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar What an odd example. A mid-sized car would have been much clearer.
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#75I wanted to see some pictures, this paper has good ones: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.10332 If you put your finger in front of a garden slug it may try to eat it, it's a very odd sand-paper sensation but I never knew why.
"try"? If it's harder than your skin it means it did, not tried.
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#76> Thats’s comparable to a single strand of spaghetti holding up about 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar What an odd example. A mid-sized car would have been much clearer.
Woah that must weigh almost 3,301 pounds!
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#77> 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar Ah, but how many one pound bags of concrete could it hold?? Why bags of anything? This is a poor way of communicating weight. Just say "a modern passenger car".
Sorry I only understand football field based units of measurement
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#78Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#79> Thats’s comparable to a single strand of spaghetti holding up about 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar What an odd example. A mid-sized car would have been much clearer.
I'd like this to be expressed in units of pallet(s) of standard cinder blocks.
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry I only understand football field based units of measurement
Understandable, with how many there are to pick from, and the wiggle room in the longest ones - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8b/As...
In the “for what it’s worth” department, Brits called it soccer too. I have no idea why they swapped to football recently.