Earlier quoted context omitted.
So many interesting things there. Jobs and Campbell knew each other from Apple antiquity, and both Campbell and Eric Schmidt sat on Apple's board - and Jobs was already ballistic about Android vs. iPhone. On one hand I understand how Jobs would have been angry about Google trying to poach the Safari team for Chrome, but on the other I completely agree that anti-poaching schemes (as well as non-compete clauses) are ha…
> Jobs was already ballistic about Android vs. iPhone. This was 2005, well before that, which is part of what makes it interesting. I think this was about the time that Apple picked up the KDE Konqueror browser Webkit platform and reworked it. I seem to recall there being some objections to Apple fulfilling its open-source obligations by tossing a massive patch "over the wall" ... P.S. quick search result, 2003: http…
Apple Execs on Facebook (2011)
141–143 of 143 posts
Re: Apple Execs on Facebook (2011)
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
So many interesting things there. Jobs and Campbell knew each other from Apple antiquity, and both Campbell and Eric Schmidt sat on Apple's board - and Jobs was already ballistic about Android vs. iPhone. On one hand I understand how Jobs would have been angry about Google trying to poach the Safari team for Chrome, but on the other I completely agree that anti-poaching schemes (as well as non-compete clauses) are ha…
> One fair solution for employees would presumably have been to deal with it head on and make competing offers up to the level of the Safari team's actual value to Apple Money does not solve all problems. Sometimes people leave companies and there is no dollar value that will get them to come back.
Re: Apple Execs on Facebook (2011)
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
But then they'd also have to obliterate Microsoft, Google, and who knows what else. This won't happen.
But the user as almost full control of a M$ and google device. These are not related unless I'm misunderstanding.