The difference between a theory, a conspiracy theory and the truth are best described by varying levels of evidence. A theory is not currently accepted as the truth, but it might be the truth. A conspiracy theory is something that has been proven to be untrue, but people still believe it and pass it on. The truth is the internally consistent and fact supported state of the world as it was and as it is. There were man…
The phrase "conspiracy theory" is, top-to-bottom, a word to get you to stop thinking. It's not a conspiracy theory, it's just the history of the phrase. It's the outgroup concept applied directly to the concept of new or disagreeing information. A pre-emptive propaganda strike on anyone who might ask questions.
NSA Owns Everything (2015)
141–150 of 265 posts
Re: NSA Owns Everything (2015)
#142The difference between a theory, a conspiracy theory and the truth are best described by varying levels of evidence. A theory is not currently accepted as the truth, but it might be the truth. A conspiracy theory is something that has been proven to be untrue, but people still believe it and pass it on. The truth is the internally consistent and fact supported state of the world as it was and as it is. There were man…
No, it's not. It's a theory that a conspiracy has taken place.
Re: NSA Owns Everything (2015)
#143The Snowden stuff was the event that shook me to my core. I was a happy technologist till then, thinking that such was the nature of life and progress simply was unfolding in front of me. However, the way the event was covered by the media - told a different story. The media focussed on the man rather than the info he provided, so the conversation was 'where was he?', 'where was his girlfriend?', etc - that told me e…
> things like bits of his glasses disappearing indicate that he could be CGI So you're essentially saying the revelations were a false flag operation? I considered that possibility, but Snowden's background is well researched and the first thing media outlets look at before publishing their findings. The Guardian probably thoroughly doxed him before publishing anything. And in interviews he comes across as sincere an…
Re: NSA Owns Everything (2015)
#144The difference between a theory, a conspiracy theory and the truth are best described by varying levels of evidence. A theory is not currently accepted as the truth, but it might be the truth. A conspiracy theory is something that has been proven to be untrue, but people still believe it and pass it on. The truth is the internally consistent and fact supported state of the world as it was and as it is. There were man…
Re: NSA Owns Everything (2015)
#145The difference between a theory, a conspiracy theory and the truth are best described by varying levels of evidence. A theory is not currently accepted as the truth, but it might be the truth. A conspiracy theory is something that has been proven to be untrue, but people still believe it and pass it on. The truth is the internally consistent and fact supported state of the world as it was and as it is. There were man…
They didn't have the legal right.
> All it took was one person willing to burn their career to provide the proof.
Snowden proved that the NSA does not vacuum everything up in the US and only vacuums everything in a few countries. You seem to be reading different documents from the ones that Snowden released.
Re: NSA Owns Everything (2015)
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
A conspiracy theory is just a theory that a conspiracy has happened. In popular usage there's an assumption that it's incorrect, but that's not part of the definition of conspiracy theory.
If you're going to pick nits at least use the full definition. For a shorthand it was accurate enough, and in popular usage the assumption is not that it is incorrect but that the facts as known do not support the outrageous claims made by the believers in these theories. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory#Etymology_an... Examples such as the Climate Change hoax, Moon Landing hoax, COVID-19 hoax, New Wor…
Re: NSA Owns Everything (2015)
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
> willing to burn their career to provide the proof. This should have been the case as in normal whistleblower cases. Seems it was not. I also suspect that Russia will eventually try and call the favor to coerce him to do something for them EDIT: had no idea this would be so negatively viewed. If you're going to down vote please indicate what you're against...
Him being there makes Russia look more tolerant than his home country.. Which is already a Pretty big bonus.
Re: NSA Owns Everything (2015)
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
> willing to burn their career to provide the proof. This should have been the case as in normal whistleblower cases. Seems it was not. I also suspect that Russia will eventually try and call the favor to coerce him to do something for them EDIT: had no idea this would be so negatively viewed. If you're going to down vote please indicate what you're against...
Him being there makes Russia look more tolerant than his home country.. Which is already a Pretty big bonus.
Re: NSA Owns Everything (2015)
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
>All it took was one person willing to burn their career to provide the proof. This is wrong. It took a LOT more than that. It took one man forgoing his life and liberty , and a group of people endangering theirs to assist him. Snowdon is not going to get his life nor his liberty back, ever. It took multiple institutions dedicated to publishing the truth to actually bring the news to a wide audience, and it didn't en…
> willing to burn their career to provide the proof. This should have been the case as in normal whistleblower cases. Seems it was not. I also suspect that Russia will eventually try and call the favor to coerce him to do something for them EDIT: had no idea this would be so negatively viewed. If you're going to down vote please indicate what you're against...
Re: NSA Owns Everything (2015)
#150I’m really interested in how low level the hacking is, specifically network card and hard disk firmware. Does anyone have breakdowns of how these work or copies seen in the wild? I particularly liked the bit in the article about hiding data in packets intended for other hosts and harvesting them through passive relays. Is there a way to detect this sort of thing? Is everything really compromised?
> Is everything really compromised? Given the documents and budgets which have leaked so far - it seems more sensible to assume that all hardware & software is compromised until proven otherwise. From the limited information provided so far we can see that if you use any Intel CPU, any Seagate/Hitachi/Fujitsu/Samsung hard drive, any version of windows, most commercially available routers, notepad++, or VLC - the NSA…