Live data from Hacker News

The Number of Youth in Juvenile Detention in California Has Quietly Plummeted

voiceofsandiego.org

141–150 of 151 posts

Re: The Number of Youth in Juvenile Detention in California Has Quietly Plummeted

#141
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This seems like revisionist history. From the seventies thru the beginning of the nineties, the national homicide rate was double to triple what it is today. We had real crime problems in the "Tough On Crime" era, and we were hitting record crime rates. A lazy Wiki snip: Violent crime nearly quadrupled between 1960 and its peak in 1991. Property crime more than doubled over the same period. Since the 1990s, however,…

Its a very interesting subject, and depends how far down you want to go before you are satisfied with an answer. Both victimization and offending rates for murder were 3-4x the rate for blacks than whites in 1980 for example. Why was that? Could it be factors like systematic racism, redlining, bundling a lot of poor people into housing projects, brain drain in cities (due to redlining post-integration)? The result of…

Yes, the results are a mess. But did the voting public elect "tough on crime" politicians as a covert way to oppress minorities? Or did they elect those politicians because they were concerned about crime?

Re: The Number of Youth in Juvenile Detention in California Has Quietly Plummeted

#142
post #49
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So maybe make throwing someone in jail not cost a million.

We could bring back large-scale public executions. Make the punishment for shoplifting being tortured to death in a public square, and the cost of prison will go down. Sounds shocking to you? It used to be the standard in the Western world, until just a couple of centuries ago.

No, obviously there is room between "doing nothing" and Chinese-style "public executions."

How about the stocks? Make being a shithead as unpleasant as possible at least.

Re: The Number of Youth in Juvenile Detention in California Has Quietly Plummeted

#143
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I really encourage you to read The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. Hand waving away racial influences is convenient to some, but definitely not to those affected by it. If you look into the statistics, you'll see that primarily minority communities were targeted by the "tough on crime" era. And these touted "tough on crime" policies only had the effect of enslaving and crippling generat…

> The crime rates are nearly similar among all races This is patently false and not all crimes are the same. The murder and assault rate, for example, is tragically - and dangerously - high for blacks. > The thing is though, police don't patrol white communities. The thing is though, police patrol crime-ridden communities, which sadly are often black communities. Or do you think there's a massive unknown murder wave…

Like I said, I encourage you to read the book.

Actual crimes committed is what you need to look at, not who gets caught and charged. That's the part that's broken, and that's what you're using to justify the brokenness. I see this time and time again from people.

The more you patrol an area, the more crime you'll find.

All you need to do is look at the statistics. The crime rates (I don't mean arrests or charges here!) are the same or higher among whites. They simply aren't charged or harassed like minority communities are.

Re: The Number of Youth in Juvenile Detention in California Has Quietly Plummeted

#144
post #140
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I really encourage you to read The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. Hand waving away racial influences is convenient to some, but definitely not to those affected by it. If you look into the statistics, you'll see that primarily minority communities were targeted by the "tough on crime" era. And these touted "tough on crime" policies only had the effect of enslaving and crippling generat…

You misunderstand. I'm simply objecting to the claim that "tough on crime" was a political dog whistle, aka a code word all the voters understood to actually mean "oppress minorities".

"Law and order", "tough on crime", they're all code words. Maybe not everyone realizes, but they're simply a method to enforce racist policies and hierarchies without getting in trouble.

As long as you don't explicitly say it's about race, the Supreme Court has ruled time and again that it's okay for police to target minority communities.

This is all detailed with plenty of sources in the book I mentioned. It's truly sickening.

Re: The Number of Youth in Juvenile Detention in California Has Quietly Plummeted

#145
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its a very interesting subject, and depends how far down you want to go before you are satisfied with an answer. Both victimization and offending rates for murder were 3-4x the rate for blacks than whites in 1980 for example. Why was that? Could it be factors like systematic racism, redlining, bundling a lot of poor people into housing projects, brain drain in cities (due to redlining post-integration)? The result of…

Yes, the results are a mess. But did the voting public elect "tough on crime" politicians as a covert way to oppress minorities? Or did they elect those politicians because they were concerned about crime?

Option 3: Did they elect those politicians because they were concerned about the idea of crime? Fear is a powerful motivator; I'd be interested to see how areas that elected "tough on crime" politicians correlate to actual crime rates.

Re: The Number of Youth in Juvenile Detention in California Has Quietly Plummeted

#146
post #23
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tough on crime has gone out of style. We had our primaries recently and only a few conservative dinosaurs even mentioned ToC in their voter biography. Most of the candidates running for AD, circuit judge, and other legal offices were drumming up their crime intervention bonafides.

Voter suppression through felony disenfranchisement, however, remains en vogue. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/09/florida... "In Florida, more than 21 percent of black adults are disenfranchised because of this policy."

I never understood the mindset of "oh, this person committed a crime, let's disallow them from voting in the future".

My opinion is, if society has decided that an individual does not get to exercise their right to vote, then they also should have no tax liability. No taxation without representation, and all that jazz. I guarantee you if they were forced to make the choice between the two, they'd immediately reinstate every felon's voting rights.

Re: The Number of Youth in Juvenile Detention in California Has Quietly Plummeted

#147
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its a very interesting subject, and depends how far down you want to go before you are satisfied with an answer. Both victimization and offending rates for murder were 3-4x the rate for blacks than whites in 1980 for example. Why was that? Could it be factors like systematic racism, redlining, bundling a lot of poor people into housing projects, brain drain in cities (due to redlining post-integration)? The result of…

Yes, the results are a mess. But did the voting public elect "tough on crime" politicians as a covert way to oppress minorities? Or did they elect those politicians because they were concerned about crime?

I think you have to look at the effect at the end of the day. Did redlining happen to specifically punish and oppress minorities, or to let white homeowners feel "safe from criminals"?

"Lock all the criminals up" when the subtext/unspoken relation for "criminals" is "black people/minorities" is a way to oppress minorities. Its also a failure to think of or implement a different path to work against poverty or criminality - something politicians love to do as a crackdown is easier for them to implement than actually improving people's lives.

Re: The Number of Youth in Juvenile Detention in California Has Quietly Plummeted

#148
post #9
post #6

"Tough on crime" was always a dog whistle to signal to (most) voters that politicians were willing to lock up minorities for comparably minor crimes. It's good to see that the winds have shifted towards a more just system although there is a long way to go. I think there are many factors that contribute to this trend and would love to see a paper which goes into the details. I would bet that prosecutors have a lot to…

Tough on crime has gone out of style. We had our primaries recently and only a few conservative dinosaurs even mentioned ToC in their voter biography. Most of the candidates running for AD, circuit judge, and other legal offices were drumming up their crime intervention bonafides.

It's fine to not run on "tough on crime" because it was always bs anyhow. HOWEVER, I am watching what has been going on in the large midwest cities near my home and the lack of enforcement is causing crime to soar. There are definite and measurable consequences to not letting police do their jobs.

In my city, which is really just a large suburb, we have a guy up the street who is shooting guns at street signs from his back porch. There is a park and a church right behind where he is shooting. I brought this to the attention of the police as did another neighbor, but nothing has been done about it. I even showed them how I could tell where the bullets were coming from, it's not rocket science to see how each sign was hit at a certain angle. But no, I don't even think the cop was intelligent enough to understand what I told her. It's also sad that we have a former army vet who is drunk or on drugs and goes out and shoots at signs at night--no respect for his community, his neighbors, himself, or anyone.

If it takes bringing back caning or whatever, it's a small price to pay for civilization to continue.

And whether drugs are legal or not, they're a terrible idea, they will destroy your life the same as alcohol and cigarettes.

Re: The Number of Youth in Juvenile Detention in California Has Quietly Plummeted

#149

VICE's "Raised in the System" feature on juvenile prisioners shows how detrimental sending kids away to juvenile detention centers is. They are 30 times more likely to be sent to prisons as adults, completely unequipped to integrate back into society when they return from detention and the crimes they're sent away for can mostly be explained by adolescent tendencies that most people grow out of.

Yea, it's way worse to put kids in detention than having them brutalizing senior citizens.

Re: The Number of Youth in Juvenile Detention in California Has Quietly Plummeted

#150

VICE's "Raised in the System" feature on juvenile prisioners shows how detrimental sending kids away to juvenile detention centers is. They are 30 times more likely to be sent to prisons as adults, completely unequipped to integrate back into society when they return from detention and the crimes they're sent away for can mostly be explained by adolescent tendencies that most people grow out of.

What bothers me about the discussion about this in Europe is that it keeps focusing on how sorrowful and tough this system is ...

... on the people who work in it. Not on the kids. They hardly get mentioned at all.

The kids barely get mentioned at all. And of course, when the system abuses kids (including literally), the employees/bureaucrats are protected/shielded from consequences and the kids ?

Sometimes it seems like half of them commit suicide. This is distressingly common thread in the stories about these people. Now I get it, stories only make it out if they're dramatic enough, but still.

In the name of being "nice" to the kids they are locked up, excluded from schooling, imprisoned (including in solitary confinement for weeks), beaten ("pain impulses" is the psychological term), constantly moved around (so they don't have safety and predictability), and so on.

Everything is done to prevent these kids from, even if they want to, get a normal life going. But you know who this is hard on ? The employees of youth services. That's who it's hard on.

This has been going on for decades like this. The result is that most of the employees never even sees the kids. Everyone's working on figuring out what to do (without seeing the kids, of course), on dividing up the kids, on "influencing" the laws and advising government/parliament, on administrativa like processing request forms, on ... and the kids systematically aren't happy with their performance.

And the saddest part is. These people are being judged against the lowest standards you can possibly imagine. These kids, most of them have been in youth services since 10 years old or less. They have never known differently, and so they accept the abuses of the system. Getting thrown out of their residence into the street every friday evening, because they can't pay for a weekend presence, then incarcerated by the police because they weren't back on monday morning ... Kids comment "that's inconvenient, I cried a bit", and move on in the conversation as if that's the most normal thing to have happen to you. Like this is hitting your head on a door. "Oh well".

But even these kids judging these people by those sorts of extreme low standards ... aren't happy with the system, mostly because of the psychological safety issue: the kids can't predict what the youth services system will do to them in 2 months, and it's just 100% forced on them. So they can't plan, they can't compensate, they can't achieve anything, because it's just ripped away from them by someone they've never seen before 2 months down the line.

Needless to say, the standards youth services uses to judge parents are getting ever stricter, and what they themselves do is ... remniscent of the stories we used to hear from Eastern Germans when I was young.

Reality is that it's pretty damn clear that leaving a kid with alcohol addicted parents is a far superior option to putting the kid, even part time, into youth services.

Post reply on HN