Makes you wonder what we'll find out is being withheld right now, 50 years from now.
Sugar industry withheld possible evidence of cancer link 50 years ago
141–150 of 329 posts
Re: Sugar industry withheld possible evidence of cancer link 50 years ago
#14230–40 years later we might be saying the same thing about social media.
I wonder if people 80-100 years ago were as hysteric about radio and TV as we are today about social media.
One point he noted was how instantaneous global communication via television (and later the internet) enabled terrorists to hijack global attention:
>Terrorism is an invention through which any two armed people can take over an entire industry, namely television, with the eager cooperation of its owners.
-Matshall McLuhan
Re: Sugar industry withheld possible evidence of cancer link 50 years ago
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm all for eating way less sugar, but you might as well say people are addicted to food. The body needs energy, of course providing it with energy alters its physical and mental state.
Totally agree that in current times food is an addiction. Since when do we need to eat 3 meals a day? At least 90 percent of modern humans history, we used hunting and gathering to survive. Only in the last 10 percent we have agriculture, and much much later, refrigerators, supermarkets and convenience stores. If we needed this much food our species wouldn't last a week before agriculture. Spoiler alert: we lasted 30…
But here we are, needing to consume more energy because we do things (good, bad, useless or wasteful) with our time (and these things aren't directly looking for food.)
Re: Sugar industry withheld possible evidence of cancer link 50 years ago
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a documentary on Netflix about this, I think it's called Sugar x Fat.
There's 2 good documentaries I remember about the subject (though there's likely many more): That Sugar Film [1] and Fed Up [2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/That_Sugar_Film [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fed_Up_(film)
Re: Sugar industry withheld possible evidence of cancer link 50 years ago
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
The reason is that in the 1970s and 80s people started freaking out about fat. Everyone from the FDA to USDA to family doctor was telling people fat was bad. So food producers started making fat-free versions of everything. Only problem is it tasted like shit. So what did they do? They added sugar. So now you have sugar added to everything from salad dressing to pasta sauce to bread and muffins. The latter probably h…
There was no fat to remove from pasta sauce. Maybe they also figured out that sugar was addictive and added it everywhere to sell even more food with sugar?
Re: Sugar industry withheld possible evidence of cancer link 50 years ago
#146Makes you wonder what we'll find out is being withheld right now, 50 years from now.
I sometimes wonder which materials I directly interact with on a regular basis that people in a few decades wouldn't touch for anything short of large amounts of money. History tells us there are probably a few. Guessing at least a couple are plastics or plastic additives/coatings of some kind. Maybe whatever they replaced BPA with. Possibly gasoline will qualify. Probably one or two things currently on/in our food.
Re: Sugar industry withheld possible evidence of cancer link 50 years ago
#147The whole phenomenon of sugar and fructose being added to virtually everything is beyond comprehension. There are so many people, fat and slim, saying they don't want to be fat, yet eating foods with added sugar every day. Why not just replace all the added sugar with erythritol, for example? The whole situation with sugar reminds me of the situation with opium in early 19th century China
Processed food isn't engineered and manufacturered to benefit the consumer. It's designed to increase consumption.
What's most troubling is, it seems, plenty of people can't connect the dots between what they consume and their health. It's disheartening that we need a law that says, "You can't look down and see your penis when you pee...watch what you eat." Where do ppl think all that extra weight comes from, sunshine?
Re: Sugar industry withheld possible evidence of cancer link 50 years ago
#148The whole phenomenon of sugar and fructose being added to virtually everything is beyond comprehension. There are so many people, fat and slim, saying they don't want to be fat, yet eating foods with added sugar every day. Why not just replace all the added sugar with erythritol, for example? The whole situation with sugar reminds me of the situation with opium in early 19th century China
The reason is that in the 1970s and 80s people started freaking out about fat. Everyone from the FDA to USDA to family doctor was telling people fat was bad. So food producers started making fat-free versions of everything. Only problem is it tasted like shit. So what did they do? They added sugar. So now you have sugar added to everything from salad dressing to pasta sauce to bread and muffins. The latter probably h…
Re: Sugar industry withheld possible evidence of cancer link 50 years ago
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm all for eating way less sugar, but you might as well say people are addicted to food. The body needs energy, of course providing it with energy alters its physical and mental state.
>drug: a medicine or other substance which has a physiological effect when ingested or otherwise introduced into the body.
Re: Sugar industry withheld possible evidence of cancer link 50 years ago
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
There was no fat to remove from pasta sauce. Maybe they also figured out that sugar was addictive and added it everywhere to sell even more food with sugar?
If everything you are eating has sugar added, the item you eat without it will taste bitter and/or bland. Or the sugar made the bland (picked early etc) tomatoes used in the sauce more palateable.