Apple to Cease Development of Aperture and Transition Users to Photos for OS X

Post by psychometry » Sat, Jun 28, 2014, 3:09 PM UTC

alphapapa wrote: post #118

psychometry wrote: post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And what if their next platform is insufficient for your needs? Then perhaps you'll wish you still had Aperture as an option, but it'll be an obsolete application with no chance of revival.

Why are people downvoting your comments? Is there a pro-Apple, anti-FOSS element here? The more time I spend on web sites with voting, the more I think upvoting should be the only option.

Post by bluthru » Sat, Jun 28, 2014, 4:30 PM UTC

jrockway wrote: post #46

untog wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not really that weird. Fast food is, by most metrics, far more popular than Michelin star restaurants. Doesn't mean it replaces them.

McDonalds is probably making more money for its shareholders than The French Laundry, however.

Post by calinet6 » Mon, Jun 30, 2014, 2:24 AM UTC

coldtea wrote: post #130

1stop wrote: post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Adobe have picked up the pace massively since CC. I'd call it the opposite of complacency. I work heavily in most of their products (the entire Adobe suite), and the amount of features they are releasing and the speed at which they are doing it, is amazing given their size. If you focus on one product (like lightroom, which is a minor product at best) then sure, it doesn't look like much, but take a look at Edge, InD…

> Adobe have picked up the pace massively since CC. Yes, but it's also the opening stage of this. They would risk a backlash if they started their CC-only period as complacent. After all CS6 still works atm. A few years down the road though? After all Quark was also innovating and caring at first.