Chat Control Must Be Stopped
131–140 of 272 posts
Re: Chat Control Must Be Stopped
#132> Chat Control would make it mandatory for all service providers (text messaging, email, social media, cloud storage, hosting services, etc.) to scan all communications and all files (including end-to-end encrypted ones), in order to supposedly detect whatever the government deems "abusive material." I wonder why there has been such silence on this, with the exception of a handful of well written blog posts. The scop…
"including end-to-end encrypted ones" How? If they're end-to-end encrypted, they really can't be monitored unless there's a flaw in the encryption system. Don't trust messages to systems that aren't auditable.
this is happening now on most* services.
* ok, not every single one.
Re: Chat Control Must Be Stopped
#133It seems like the golden age of freedom is behind us for now, and we’re going to descend for a while back into nationalism and authoritarianism
Funniest part is, current EU politicians are setting these systems up just as nationalist and authoritarian politicians (their adversaries) start to dominate the scene. Introducing this now seems like self-sabotage.
Re: Chat Control Must Be Stopped
#134The next step is to control your mind.
Re: Chat Control Must Be Stopped
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I wonder why there has been such silence on this Yes, I would think that if there were any real journalism left, they would be all over this. For the sake of their profession, and the protection of their sources.
Cory Doctorow points out a lot of things: https://pluralistic.net/ But I don't think mainstream journalism points out computer nonsense because they're so intertwined with it all. I mean, "we have a surveillance state" first points to "advertising" which is their revenue stream.
Re: Chat Control Must Be Stopped
#136It seems like the golden age of freedom is behind us for now, and we’re going to descend for a while back into nationalism and authoritarianism
Re: Chat Control Must Be Stopped
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Some thoughts if you have them, are illegal to express, even in private, for your own consumption. fuck this attitude with a rake
In the UK we take this a step further – if you're by an abortion clinic and the police believe you could be praying in your head for those getting an abortion they can charge you. There are also examples where the people have been charged for retweeting opinions or sharing lyrics which are considered grossly offensive. Although I suppose in these cases you could at least argue something is being expressed.
Could they still arrest you?
Re: Chat Control Must Be Stopped
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
Totally. This is exactly the problem with things like Chat Control in the EU and KOSA in the US. They will just introduce the same bill over and over and over again until they get the desired result. What we need is for legislatures to pass "NO Chat Control" and "NO KOSA" bills that specifically block this behavior, but unsurprisingly governments don't seem to be too keen about limiting their own rights, only those o…
You mean enshrine a right to messaging privacy in a constitution? That's going to be difficult.
The EU does not seem to have such simple and ironclad norm.
Re: Chat Control Must Be Stopped
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
"According to data from Nielsen, Fox News — from the period spanning June 20 through Sept. 1 — finished as the no. 1 network in all of broadcast television during the primetime hours of 8-11 PM. During those hours, Fox News averaged 2.43 million total nightly viewers in primetime — topping ABC at 2.38 million, NBC at 2.21 million, and CBS at 2.03 million. It is the second time in the network’s history they accomplish…
"It sure seems like at least 1/3rd of the population has a FOX brainworm infection" - you had me right until you pulled this completely out of thin air. All the main news outlets totalling less than 9 million viewers? That's not compelling at all.
Re: Chat Control Must Be Stopped
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
Chat control will require client-side AI scanning of all messages, bypassing end-to-end encryption. Since the AI will be an unauditable blackbox, it will make it effectively illegal to have secure end-to-end encryption. Yes, it is that fascist.
I predict a massive uptick in linux use