Earlier quoted context omitted.
It'd be nice to list what those "various compliance requirements" are on a public open source project.
At least part of that might very well be illegal.
Linus Torvalds comments on the Russian Linux maintainers being delisted
131–140 of 251 posts
Re: Linus Torvalds comments on the Russian Linux maintainers being delisted
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
> One could make the identical argument for the other world power No, one couldn’t.
The Monroe Doctrine, ironically, was precipitated by negotiations with Russia[1] and is almost identical in its aims for the Western Hemisphere as Putin's nominal arguments against NATO expansion eastward, namely the assertion that the Western Hemisphere was closed to European colonization and settlement.
Is this Putin talking about NATO expansion? 'Finally, you have broader considerations that might follow what you would call the "falling domino" principle. You have a row of dominoes set up, you knock over the first one, and what will happen to the last one is the certainty that it will go over very quickly. So you could have a beginning of a disintegration that would have the most profound influences.' No, it's Dwight Eisenhower talking about communism in Indochina in 1954. The maxims "Principiis obsta" and "Finem respice" apply universally.
The Monroe Doctrine and Domino Theory were both framed as defensive policies that were then used for protectionist and geopolitical justifications for foreign wars of aggression against neighbors and neutral independent countries. Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya didn't even have the protection of these broader geopolitical aims, just naked warmongering and profiteering (Osama Bin Laden was Saudi).
The necessity for narratives of moral exceptionalism to maintain a permanently jingoist state is to be expected, but it'd be healthier for the intelligentsia to privately admit that fact rather than hiding behind moral exceptionalism even in their personal lives. The West wants to permanently de-fang and colonize Russia for obvious reasons--geopoltical hegemony and market intrusion. These reasons create a perennial playbook everyone else has played by for thousands of years. And I'm sure when NATO does inevitably fail to a novel power, the remnants will play by the same rules Monroe and Putin played by, sed Carthago delenda est.[3]
[1] https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/monroe-doctrine
Re: Linus Torvalds comments on the Russian Linux maintainers being delisted
#133Re: Linus Torvalds comments on the Russian Linux maintainers being delisted
#134[flagged]
Re: Linus Torvalds comments on the Russian Linux maintainers being delisted
#135Reposting from a duplicate discussion. Communicating clearly that you cannot currently accept contributions from people potentially associated with problematic businesses is an understandable decision. Tone of voice stated following the removal of a list of names of people you used to work with not too long makes this sound like a petty statement if anything.
[flagged]
Re: Linus Torvalds comments on the Russian Linux maintainers being delisted
#136[flagged]
Re: Linus Torvalds comments on the Russian Linux maintainers being delisted
#137Re: Linus Torvalds comments on the Russian Linux maintainers being delisted
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
> One could make the identical argument for the other world power No, one couldn’t.
I know this will get flagged and I'll get called a Russian despite being an American from flyover country: Yes, one definitely can tenably make that argument. The Monroe Doctrine, ironically, was precipitated by negotiations with Russia[1] and is almost identical in its aims for the Western Hemisphere as Putin's nominal arguments against NATO expansion eastward, namely the assertion that the Western Hemisphere was cl…
Re: Linus Torvalds comments on the Russian Linux maintainers being delisted
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
> One could make the identical argument for the other world power No, one couldn’t.
I know this will get flagged and I'll get called a Russian despite being an American from flyover country: Yes, one definitely can tenably make that argument. The Monroe Doctrine, ironically, was precipitated by negotiations with Russia[1] and is almost identical in its aims for the Western Hemisphere as Putin's nominal arguments against NATO expansion eastward, namely the assertion that the Western Hemisphere was cl…
The West wants to permanently de-fang and colonize Russia for obvious reasons -- geopolitical hegemony and market intrusion.
Which in your view is the basic reason we have the war in Ukraine right now, is what I'm hearing.
Re: Linus Torvalds comments on the Russian Linux maintainers being delisted
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
Russia spends hundreds of millions on propaganda (paid trolls), sabotage, and espionage. There is lot of cases for Article 4 of NATO already. It's better to say sorry than to risk millions of lives.
US spends billions on paid propaganda. https://responsiblestatecraft.org/china-cold-war-2669160202/