Having written my thesis in LaTex, I can say it is wonderful and a wonderful waste of time.
Having written a report in Word that was about 1/4 of the size of my dissertation, but had some of the same content, and then the dissertation in LaTeX, I can say that as much as LaTeX wastes your time, it's by far the least wasteful option.
I hate LaTeX, I love LaTeX
131–140 of 245 posts
Re: I hate LaTeX, I love LaTeX
#132Re: I hate LaTeX, I love LaTeX
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
For how long do we still need to print a paper?
For as long as I use time sitting on public transport and airplanes to review them. Nothing beats the ergonomics of a printout, a red pen and no internet.
Reading long form content on a screen gives me awful eyestrain.
Plus I love the smell of a good book.
Re: I hate LaTeX, I love LaTeX
#134Try TeXmacs, it's neither TeX nor it's Emacs clone. TeXmacs is WYSIWYG scientific editing platform. Documents created can be saved in TeXmacs, Xml, Scheme, PDF or Postscript. Converters exist for TeX/LaTeX and HTML/MathML. It can also be used as a graphical front-end for other computer algebra, numerical analysis, statistics software[1]. [1] https://www.texmacs.org/tmweb/home/welcome.en.html
Another good WYSIWYG front end is LyX: www.lyx.org . I've written a few hundred physics lecture notes with it, as well as a number of Beamer presentations. I find it much easier to use than TeXmacs (mainly because of keyboard shortcuts), and the output is excellent. And yes, it produces true TeX/LaTeX.
Re: I hate LaTeX, I love LaTeX
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps my example is poor, but it shows that hands are not coupled to predation I'm specifically talking about the evolution of hands, humans are not the only organism with hands.
The poster didn't say "hands", they said "your hands". Your human hands, which co-evolved with throwing things, we have abundant paleontological evidence of this and you may read as many papers on the subject as you would care to.
Re: I hate LaTeX, I love LaTeX
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you consider a "design" to result from a process where someone sketches out a plan, builds it, and it works first time. I've designed a lot of systems, and it is clearly an iterative process. Balancing tradeoffs, figuring out the essentials, build prototypes, test, etc. If you are patient and diligent a solution emerges. That sounds a lot like evolution, so in my mind everything in nature has been designed by the…
I think that's a reasonable perspective to take, although I would argue that there is no clear goal in evolution besides survival and reproduction
Re: I hate LaTeX, I love LaTeX
#137Re: I hate LaTeX, I love LaTeX
#138Re: I hate LaTeX, I love LaTeX
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
Having written a report in Word that was about 1/4 of the size of my dissertation, but had some of the same content, and then the dissertation in LaTeX, I can say that as much as LaTeX wastes your time, it's by far the least wasteful option.
Strong agree. My fiance and I wrote our thesis simultaneously, she in Word, while I used LaTeX. The amount of stupid figure- and page- rearrangements she suffered because she removed half a sentence from the middle, while LaTeX generated sane output with basically any text seriously made me much more productive.
I made my partner switch to Latex thanks to the bibliography. Writing tables almost made her switch back to Word.
[0]: https://www.sfu.ca/~ljilja/cnl/info/UseCrossReference/index....
Re: I hate LaTeX, I love LaTeX
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I always find this a bit sad, because it seems to take away the idea that programming is about assembling composable parts [OT] Concerning "programming is about assembling composable parts": I always find both sad and ridiculous when self-proclaimed software developers bash Unix because they are not able to appreciate its philosophy.
It would help Unix’s case if the glue between the parts wouldn’t be byte streams and some very crude int result code, signals, etc. A monolith can be just as composable if not more, with a much “stronger glue” in the form of language-mandated guarantees. Also, sometimes doing multiple things well is the better direction — IPC is additional complexity and essential complexity can’t be decomposed.