Live data from Hacker News

Trapped in lockdown, Shanghai residents turn to WeChat groups for food

restofworld.org

131–140 of 199 posts

Re: Trapped in lockdown, Shanghai residents turn to WeChat groups for food

#131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You mean our fight against Covid is pretty much over - and has ended with complete capitulation. We are now letting it do as it will, for better or for worse - surrendering to our fate.

What was the alternative?

Better ventilation of indoor spaces, more utilisation of outdoor spaces, better sick pay provision, more WFH, etc, etc - essentially the complete mobilisation of society to defeat COVID, whatever it took.

A dress rehearsal for climate change.

Re: Trapped in lockdown, Shanghai residents turn to WeChat groups for food

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a lot more that can be done besides lockdowns - we can have actually useful contact tracing and testing. There are tons of measures that can be implemented to reduce transmission. We're giving up on all of that. Besides, viral infections are very damaging to the human body. An infection severe enough to knock you out for multiple days multiple times a year, on top of all the other disease we have, each time…

I absolutely love the goalposts for some people seem to have shifted from “this ends when we have a vaccine” all the way to “this ends when we have a newer, better vaccine”. When will people finally accept this is a battle that cannot be won. Humans cannot stop a contagious respiratory virus any better than they can stop a hurricane, tornado or earthquake.

> Humans cannot stop a contagious respiratory virus any better than they can stop a hurricane, tornado or earthquake.

Yep, and these actions of trying to stop the virus with border closings and lockdowns was 100% ideas from china and north korea, the crazy thing, as mentioned in other comments, is that the western world followed and also went on this futile insane don quijotean crusade.

Re: Trapped in lockdown, Shanghai residents turn to WeChat groups for food

#133
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, infection is not more protective than vaccination. Vaccination is much more consistent than infection - not least because the vaccine is not packaged with immune suppressing elements.

That's not true: "Naturally infected populations were less likely to be reinfected by SARS-CoV-2 than the infection-naïve and vaccinated individuals." https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-05325-5 There are other studies that say the same thing - natural immunity is far superior to vaccination. (But also more risky since acquiring that immunity can cause people to end up in the hospital.) The best is both: "Two…

Agree the best is both. Your source pertains to Bangladesh, not sure the results necessarily carry more generally, due to the different society/demographics/etc.

Please provide sources for your other studies - "far superior" is quite a strong claim

Re: Trapped in lockdown, Shanghai residents turn to WeChat groups for food

#134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, infection is not more protective than vaccination. Vaccination is much more consistent than infection - not least because the vaccine is not packaged with immune suppressing elements.

Consistency refers to the spread not the mean. For instance, you could have a vaccine performing uniformly poorly relative to a prior infection and that sure would be consistent.

I was implying consistently good. As in, the ~ 90% protection was relatively uniform

Re: Trapped in lockdown, Shanghai residents turn to WeChat groups for food

#135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You mean our fight against Covid is pretty much over - and has ended with complete capitulation. We are now letting it do as it will, for better or for worse - surrendering to our fate.

You do realize we have vaccines now, no?

It doesn't seem that vaccines can be the complete answer - due to waning and variant mutational avoidance. Unlike measles vaccine. Hence other measures may be necessary if we wish to control Covid

Re: Trapped in lockdown, Shanghai residents turn to WeChat groups for food

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You do realize we have vaccines now, no?

It doesn't seem that vaccines can be the complete answer - due to waning and variant mutational avoidance. Unlike measles vaccine. Hence other measures may be necessary if we wish to control Covid

Warning efficiency vs. Infection, not deaths.

And omicron is practically harmless for the vaccinated.

Re: Trapped in lockdown, Shanghai residents turn to WeChat groups for food

#137
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you have a citation for that? The data I'be seen suggests no reduction in severity due to previous infection.

"Reinfections had 90% lower odds of resulting in hospitalization or death than primary infections. Four reinfections were severe enough to lead to acute care hospitalization. None led to hospitalization in an ICU, and none ended in death." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmc2108120 It was literally the first hit on google. And it's well known that infection is much more protective than vaccination (although r…

Here are the two recent studies I've seen that suggest reinfections are not rare and have similar severity to the first. Qatar's reports have been good so I wouldn't discount their results, and it's possible that the 81 study meta-review and the VA system data don't accurately capture what's really happening, but still they are the strongest cases I've seen in the area.

I haven't seen any case that protection from infection is better than at least the mRNA vaccines, only that it's inconsistent and wanes relatively rapidly. Where'd you find that?

Burden of PCR-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection in the U.S. Veterans Administration, March 2020 – January 2022 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.03.20.22272571v...

The mystery of COVID-19 reinfections: A global systematic review and meta-analysis https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34900250/

Re: Trapped in lockdown, Shanghai residents turn to WeChat groups for food

#138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ah, what I'm talking about is something else - people are being infected through the vaccine, and get a second breakthrough infection within a month of the first one. I don't know how widespread it is. Reinfections are generally milder than the first infection, but it's not the case every time. If we let the virus run through like wildfire and accumulate mutation after mutation as it runs through billions of hosts ev…

> people are being infected through the vaccine Worth noting the difference between Sinovac and other vaccines: Sinovac is a deactivated virus, whereas almost all of the others do not contain any virus. So nobody is 'infected through the vaccine'.

I mean infected through the vaccine as in despite the vaccine, not as in acquiring it from the vaccination.

Re: Trapped in lockdown, Shanghai residents turn to WeChat groups for food

#139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a lot more that can be done besides lockdowns - we can have actually useful contact tracing and testing. There are tons of measures that can be implemented to reduce transmission. We're giving up on all of that. Besides, viral infections are very damaging to the human body. An infection severe enough to knock you out for multiple days multiple times a year, on top of all the other disease we have, each time…

I absolutely love the goalposts for some people seem to have shifted from “this ends when we have a vaccine” all the way to “this ends when we have a newer, better vaccine”. When will people finally accept this is a battle that cannot be won. Humans cannot stop a contagious respiratory virus any better than they can stop a hurricane, tornado or earthquake.

The vaccines simply don't work as well anymore. If they were still as effective as they were at the start, we wouldn't be here.

We could have ensured that by limiting worldwide transmission and distributing the vaccines more homogeneously, but we didn't.

Also, we can and have stopped contagious respiratory viruses. Multiple times.

Re: Trapped in lockdown, Shanghai residents turn to WeChat groups for food

#140
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Who you're replying to specifically cited Omicron. The study you posted is older than Omicron. There is evidence Omicron and Delta are much better at reinfection.

According to https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2200133 Omicron has 56.0% protection but: "Among the patients with reinfection, progression to severe Covid-19 occurred in one patient with the alpha variant, in two patients with the beta variant, in no patients with the delta variant, and in two patients with the omicron variant. None of the reinfections progressed to critical or fatal Covid-19. The effectiven…

Deaths is not the metric that matters. Transmission is. It doesn't matter if the chance of death or severe illness is divided by 5, if you end up being reinfected 10 times over a few years.
Post reply on HN