If you stop mining bitcoins, Bitcoin would not disappear....
If you stop mining bitcoins, anybody with a small rig can produce a double spend and destroy all trust in the network. It wouldn't disappear, but the coins wouldn't be worth much.
Bitcoin's vast energy use could burst its bubble
131–140 of 157 posts
Re: Bitcoin's vast energy use could burst its bubble
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you stop mining bitcoins, anybody with a small rig can produce a double spend and destroy all trust in the network. It wouldn't disappear, but the coins wouldn't be worth much.
Proof of stake would solve that?
Re: Bitcoin's vast energy use could burst its bubble
#133If you stop mining bitcoins, Bitcoin would not disappear....
If no more bitcoins were mined, you couldn't move bitcoins around. You can only include new transactions by mining a new block.
Re: Bitcoin's vast energy use could burst its bubble
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder about the value of gold. You might buy gold, but can you actually, physically hold it and own it? As far as I know, the only way you can buy gold is if you either buy jewelry or are a jeweler to make said jewelry. Otherwise you’re just buying stocks which could theoretically be lost in the digital wind.
You can definitely buy gold coins. I have one in my desk drawer right now, even.
Obviously even bare gold would have a markup, but probably not as much as coins.
Re: Bitcoin's vast energy use could burst its bubble
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
Proof of stake would solve that?
But then you're no longer talking about Bitcoin.
Re: Bitcoin's vast energy use could burst its bubble
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
As an owner of 50 bitcoins that I bought in 2010, I must say I agree with you. I don't see bitcoin as a future of money nor payment.
I'm curious, did you originally own more than 50? If not, do you have a plan for when you will sell? I know if I'd bought 50 bitcoins back in 2010 I would have sold them, or at least most of them, many times over by now.
Re: Bitcoin's vast energy use could burst its bubble
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
As an owner of 50 bitcoins that I bought in 2010, I must say I agree with you. I don't see bitcoin as a future of money nor payment.
Congratulations. You can now retire.
Re: Bitcoin's vast energy use could burst its bubble
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
As an owner of 50 bitcoins that I bought in 2010, I must say I agree with you. I don't see bitcoin as a future of money nor payment.
what about Ethereum?
Re: Bitcoin's vast energy use could burst its bubble
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
That equivalence exists in the domain of classical physics. Bitcoin only exists in semiconductor systems: its ineffectiveness stems from the extra logical layer (gates on silicon) which, while based on quantum effects, does not utilize quantum effects directly for calculation.
Doesn’t any method by which work is done, in a proof of work system, consume energy?