I feel that asking a user for the right username after they sign up wastes even more time when they can settle it all at once at the sign up page... The tips mostly reduce hassle and why cause them more trouble by alerting them that their username is already taken when they felt they're already set to use the site.
Techniques To Simplify Sign-Ups and Log-Ins
131–140 of 178 posts
Re: Techniques To Simplify Sign-Ups and Log-Ins
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
Having the newsletter unchecked by default is effectively the same as not having a newsletter. Personally, I think "don't have a newsletter" is a great idea (it reduces UI cutter too), but people want to send newsletters and the only way to make sending a newsletter worth the time spent to prepare it is by making it opt-out not opt-in. edit: I'm not saying I support this, just that a newsletter is never done in the u…
Opt-out newsletters are illegal in the EU, as per EU Directive 2002/58/EC.
Indeed the Article only says they have to allow you to object, nothing about the company not sending you repeated emails when you do object.
Looks badly drafted and without teeth IMO.
--- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive_on_Privacy_and_Electr... http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:... - full current text
Re: Techniques To Simplify Sign-Ups and Log-Ins
#133Not sure if it was accidental or not, but we ended up with the single simplest sign-up/login I've ever seen. We've even received a few emails from users alarmed at how simple it is. We're considering adding a few artificial steps (like filling out a profile) so that users feel more like they are creating an account. 1. Click login 2. Choose account provider 3. Grant us authorization access 4. Done - we pull your name…
We did that for an app, and let people pick from Google, Twitter, or Yahoo. They'd sometimes forget which one they'd chosen (like after being away from a bit or clearing the cache), and then login with a different one and get confused as to why their data was missing. Do you encounter that at all with your users?
But, at the moment since we support only two providers, and those providers tend to be pretty divisive with little overlap, we haven't noticed any real problems yet.
Re: Techniques To Simplify Sign-Ups and Log-Ins
#134Re: Techniques To Simplify Sign-Ups and Log-Ins
#135Re: Techniques To Simplify Sign-Ups and Log-Ins
#136I hate being forced to login with my email address. My username is the same or similar for most sites I use but I use a site specific email (with gmails + feature) for almost every sign up.
i presume you use that to filter spam. you could always have your userid as your email where the email is always username+site@emailprovider.com however, i have noticed some sites dont like the + which sucks because the spam model breaks down
Re: Techniques To Simplify Sign-Ups and Log-Ins
#137> use a hidden and required text field generated with client-side Javascript So now only users with Javascript enabled can use your website. I'm sure that will increase conversion. > Spambots can’t fill in the field because they can’t interact with objects in client-side JavaScript; only users can. Not true anymore. > you can create a honeypot form field that should be left blank and then use CSS to hide it from huma…
>> "So now only users with Javascript enabled can use your website. " It's easy to measure what percentage of your users have JavaScript disabled. For a consumer website, it's probably measured in the hundredths of a percent . If you can make a change that increases the conversion for 99.97% of your users, even at the cost of ZEROING the conversion for 0.03% of your users, then you will still come out ahead.
Another site I maintain shows numbers like 3% IE6 and 1% non-JS. What a difference!
Of course, for the first site I mentioned, we made it sure the site graciously degrades for non-JS and/or IE6 users. We don't want to lose 15% of our customers.
Re: Techniques To Simplify Sign-Ups and Log-Ins
#138Any ideas for speeding up birthdate entry? Lots of sites need it to comply with COPPA.
Re: Techniques To Simplify Sign-Ups and Log-Ins
#139"Use a Question Mark Icon for the Password Recovery Link" Am I the only one who thinks that is really unintuitive? I don't even think clicking on that icon would cross my mind as a user, and I would spend my time trying to find the "Forgot Password" link.
The way that I've always handled this is to only show the "Forgot Password" link after a login attempt fails. Maybe that's unfair; expecting a user to attempt to login even if they're not sure of their details, but it always seemed reasonable enough to me.
Re: Techniques To Simplify Sign-Ups and Log-Ins
#1401000x times yes about the newsletter checkbox. Nothing turns me off to a service more than being tricked into receiving a newsletter. I consider those to be spam and mark them as such.