Earlier quoted context omitted.
>As I said previously, I would love to hear the historical case you have in mind. Let's examine the facts and discuss further. Saying we disagree in the interpretation of historical events without even discussing any is a cop out and intellectually disingenuous. We would only be discussing our subjective interpretations of facts. I don't think that's intellectually disingenuous. For example, how could you argue with…
>What is a "free" market? I think this is the important question. My core belief is that actors in an economy will act according to game theory. Is a free market one with no rules? If so, what is to stop someone from lying, cheating, or stealing? Is a free market a system with a few basic principles? While clearly defining a free market is an important discussion, I think it out of the scope of this discussion. The d…
This is simply untrue. You cannot blame the concept of government for what people in governments do. I can be against what a private industry does without being against the concept of industries altogether.
>I find it ironic that you believe private businesses would do you personal harm, but you have no similar concerns for government.
I said no such thing. I said that I have more of a say in what happens in my government than in a private business.