Live data from Hacker News

Oracle justified its JavaScript trademark with Node.js–now it wants that ignored

deno.com

121–130 of 201 posts

Re: Oracle justified its JavaScript trademark with Node.js–now it wants that ignored

#121
post #64

Just under 30 years ago, when I was starting my IT studies, I had an older colleague who was a great authority to me. When I began learning about RDBMS options, I called him to ask, „What do you think about Oracle?”. He just shouted, „Total crap!!!” and that was enough for me. Since then, to this day, I’ve never touched Oracle.

[deleted]

Re: Oracle justified its JavaScript trademark with Node.js–now it wants that ignored

#122
post #6

Knowing Oracle, they will take it to court if they can. To paraphrase Cantrill, it's a company that behaves very much like a lawnmower.

If you want to personify the mistaken belief "if a company can make money legally then it is obliged in law to do it, to maximise shareholder value" thing: Oracle is that company. There is only one goal. Immediate reporting cycle uptick benefit. There is no other goal. I can think of almost no play they have made in the market which has any longterm net beneficial outcome for the entire market, despite "grow a bigger…

The likelihood of the JavaScript trademark bringing any real benefit to Oracle in the future is close to zero, but the legal costs of taking it to court are significant. For the sake of mere spite and mean-spiritedness they seem to be trying to waste the company's money.

Re: Oracle justified its JavaScript trademark with Node.js–now it wants that ignored

#123
post #9

I appreciate Ryan taking this up, and the updates are interesting. Obviously I'm not paying for the lawyers but it feels like "oh Oracle is trying to add months of delays" feels pretty normal. Only months! If the process just trudges along for a couple of years before reaching a "good" conclusion, still worth doing! And very happy that this is an actual legal proceeding and "try to sign a petition asking Oracle nicel…

> [0]: Again, I'm not paying for the lawyers or doing anything useful at all! It sucks that these kinds of disclaimers are necessary these days. I've also had more than my fair share of "you're not helping so you don't get to have an opinion"

The open thing is that the person doing the thing is allowed a greater say to strategy IMO.

Re: Oracle justified its JavaScript trademark with Node.js–now it wants that ignored

#124
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Do not fall into the trap of anthropomorphising Larry Ellison. You need to think of Larry Ellison the way you think of a lawnmower. You don't anthropomorphize your lawnmower, the lawnmower just mows the lawn, you stick your hand in there and it'll chop it off, the end. You don't think 'oh, the lawnmower hates me' -- lawnmower doesn't give a shit about you, lawnmower can't hate you. Don't anthropomorphize the lawnmo…

I started to dislike that quote somewhat. Why should we celebrate the fact that our society doesn't place moral pressure onto executives? Why should we find it acceptable that this is the status quo?

You could interpret it the other way: Such executives don't have moral protection.

Re: Oracle justified its JavaScript trademark with Node.js–now it wants that ignored

#125

Hear me out: the web / oss community could absolutely band together and rebrand JavaScript. Could be: LiveScript, WebScript, etc. There would be good support and we could do it fairly swiftly. To hell with Oracle.

I thought that was 'ecmascript' ??

It is, but everyone hates that and has no idea how to say it.

Re: Oracle justified its JavaScript trademark with Node.js–now it wants that ignored

#126

I'm glad this is being fought, Oracle is a demon. > The major implementations of JavaScript are in the browsers built by Mozilla, Google, Apple, and Microsoft Isn't MS's browser just Chromium? Weird to add them to the list when they don't build a browser any more. Why not add Brave, etc?

> Isn't MS's browser just Chromium?

No. It's based on Chromium. It has quite a bit on functionally that's not available on Chrome or Chromium.

Re: Oracle justified its JavaScript trademark with Node.js–now it wants that ignored

#127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought that was 'ecmascript' ??

It is, but everyone hates that and has no idea how to say it.

LOL - fair enough. Always sounded like a skin condition to me.. (I'm not a JS programmer though)

Re: Oracle justified its JavaScript trademark with Node.js–now it wants that ignored

#128
post #122
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you want to personify the mistaken belief "if a company can make money legally then it is obliged in law to do it, to maximise shareholder value" thing: Oracle is that company. There is only one goal. Immediate reporting cycle uptick benefit. There is no other goal. I can think of almost no play they have made in the market which has any longterm net beneficial outcome for the entire market, despite "grow a bigger…

The likelihood of the JavaScript trademark bringing any real benefit to Oracle in the future is close to zero, but the legal costs of taking it to court are significant. For the sake of mere spite and mean-spiritedness they seem to be trying to waste the company's money.

Yes, the only upside I can see for them is it reinforces their reputation of being ruthless in legal proceedings. Which you might consider a good thing if you subscribe to the "it is better to be feared than loved" philosophy.

Re: Oracle justified its JavaScript trademark with Node.js–now it wants that ignored

#129

Hear me out: the web / oss community could absolutely band together and rebrand JavaScript. Could be: LiveScript, WebScript, etc. There would be good support and we could do it fairly swiftly. To hell with Oracle.

I also wouldn't complain about losing the confusion between Java and JavaScript.

Re: Oracle justified its JavaScript trademark with Node.js–now it wants that ignored

#130

Anyone else read the article and say Oracle JET? What is that?

First time I'd ever heard of it too; I ran straight to Google and it only came up with results for "Breville Oracle Jet Espresso Machine" which interestingly enough Breville seem to hold a trademark on "Oracle" itself in the machines and tools class!

Oooh, can we convince Breville to sue Oracle for any software they make that is described as a "tool"?

How about the Oracle Java Virtual Machine.

Post reply on HN