Live data from Hacker News

The myth of Japan's failure

nytimes.com

121–123 of 123 posts

Re: The myth of Japan's failure

#121
post #94
post #63

There's a lot to admin about Japan, but this article is hackery at best and deceptive at worst. The article is almost solely focused on Tokyo. Yes, Tokyo is still doing well. It's still one of the richest cities in the world. But Tokyo cannot be held up as "Japan", just as New York cannot be used as representative of the entire U.S. Life expectancy in the U.S. has gone up by 4.43 years since 1980. All rich-world coun…

It also has wonderful quotes like: "The Japanese are dressed better than Americans. They have the latest cars, including Porsches, Audis, Mercedes-Benzes and all the finest models. I have never seen so many spoiled pets." Americans do the same crazy stuff, but they do it in a way that looks unremarkable to other Americans.

That sentence made me wonder if the author had never been to California. Speaking as a Brit, that sentence could so easily apply to any non-American's perspective on people in that state (I've only really spent time in NY and CA, BTW, so I acknowledge that my perception of life in the US is just as skewed as the author's pereception of life in Japan, but in a sense that's exactly my point).

Re: The myth of Japan's failure

#122
post #73
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> And some of it is just strange. Michelin ratings as a measure of the strength of an economy? Cultural factors matter as much as economic strength, there. I was in a theater on the 4th to watch _Nausicaa_, and one of the previews was for a documentary about some sushi chef. Breathlessly it mentioned that he was the first Japanese restaurant to receive 3 Michelin stars. I was a little astonished. 'Yes, I know 3 Miche…

From what I've been able to find, it looks like Michelin didn't review Japan at all until around 2007-2008.

That would make sense.

Re: The myth of Japan's failure

#123
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All marketing is "keep people busy" work. In Australia, people don't like service-people. There's this weird pseudo-independence thing, where we'd like to believe that we haven't oppressed any workers to get our cup of coffee. It's not a problem if the coffee was grown by plantation slaves, and made by a Philippino guest-worker on an exploitive H1B1 equivalent visa, but the waitress had better be quick, efficient, an…

Having worked in retail and service jobs, I can tell you that a generous fraction of Australian consumers rely on the lowly checkout chick / salesman / service assistant / phone operator etc as someone to prop up their self-worth through condescension.

If you want to do something bad to a person (i.e. slightly inconvenience them) it's a lot easier to justify if you hold them in contempt.
Post reply on HN