Live data from Hacker News

When a Bike Company Put a TV on Its Box, Shipping Damages Went Down (2017)

bicycling.com

121–130 of 278 posts

Re: When a Bike Company Put a TV on Its Box, Shipping Damages Went Down (2017)

#121
post #76
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I work as a postman. People don't really send letters any more, so a large and increasing percentage is packages. Many (most?) of my coworkers hate their jobs, and their lives, and are deliberately rough with packages, especially if they look expensive.

"I'm unhappy with my life so I'm going to make other people unhappy too." How about these people do something with their incredibly valuable short lives other than being miserable? Unless you're in chronic pain of some kind, being alive is a gift. It's a treasure. Every moment is precious.

Because they are stuck doing a stressful job with probably low pay or poor hours to make ends meet?

Re: When a Bike Company Put a TV on Its Box, Shipping Damages Went Down (2017)

#123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The odd thing about this is that it can be much more work to handle things roughly. One time I was waiting for a flight and watching the activity out the window, and the guy who was transferring bags from the little truck-train onto the ramp that slides them up into the airliner was throwing each bag into the air and onto the ramp. It was clear that it would have taken much less effort to just set each bag onto the r…

Treating the bags gently takes more time and effort. For starters you don't know heavy the bag is, so first you have to figure that out, and you have to spend effort managing its downward trajectory. It's more wear on the joints and body to handle it carefully than to just throw each bag with good form. I don't know what I'm talking about, so treat that with a grain of salt, but it's plausible.

It's the other way around, less wear if you are careful. Tossing around puts more strain on your joints.

Re: When a Bike Company Put a TV on Its Box, Shipping Damages Went Down (2017)

#124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This does not surprise me much. I think it comes down to incentives. The package handlers only have a certain amount of time per package. There are few if any consequences for being rough, and it saves time, so of course the package handlers end up being rough. This isn't the only time you see this sort of selfish behavior from delivery companies. As a cyclist I commonly encounter delivery trucks parked in the bike l…

Empty his tire. Make sure it's visible to him when he comes back.

If you're suggesting that somebody slash a truck tire, you should know that's a good way to get maimed.

Re: When a Bike Company Put a TV on Its Box, Shipping Damages Went Down (2017)

#126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This does not surprise me much. I think it comes down to incentives. The package handlers only have a certain amount of time per package. There are few if any consequences for being rough, and it saves time, so of course the package handlers end up being rough. This isn't the only time you see this sort of selfish behavior from delivery companies. As a cyclist I commonly encounter delivery trucks parked in the bike l…

Empty his tire. Make sure it's visible to him when he comes back.

That's vandalism. Two wrongs don't make a right.

Re: When a Bike Company Put a TV on Its Box, Shipping Damages Went Down (2017)

#127
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's cute, but wrong. Even the most law-abiding delivery company is going to end up with some parking tickets, so it makes sense to budget for them. You may as well decry the budgeting for legal as saying the company wants to break the law.

> Even the most law-abiding delivery company is going to end up with some parking tickets Why? If you don’t park illegally you don’t get tickets. They aren’t random or accidental.

Parking violations usually don't require proof of intent. So unless you believe people never make mistakes and are always fully knowledgeable about parking rules, then tickets are sometimes random (or at least capricious) and accidental.

Re: When a Bike Company Put a TV on Its Box, Shipping Damages Went Down (2017)

#128
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

the drivers are basically incentivized to break the law When a delivery company has a line item in its budget to cover parking tickets as a cost of doing business, it's already decided at the corporate level to disregard the law in favor of making a profit.

That's cute, but wrong. Even the most law-abiding delivery company is going to end up with some parking tickets, so it makes sense to budget for them. You may as well decry the budgeting for legal as saying the company wants to break the law.

"You may as well decry the budgeting for legal as saying the company wants to break the law."

Why? Doing everything correctly and within the law costs money.

Re: When a Bike Company Put a TV on Its Box, Shipping Damages Went Down (2017)

#129
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

the drivers are basically incentivized to break the law When a delivery company has a line item in its budget to cover parking tickets as a cost of doing business, it's already decided at the corporate level to disregard the law in favor of making a profit.

That's cute, but wrong. Even the most law-abiding delivery company is going to end up with some parking tickets, so it makes sense to budget for them. You may as well decry the budgeting for legal as saying the company wants to break the law.

Don't the parking tickets have to be paid by the driver though, and not the company? FedEx doesn't even own their delivery trucks, the drivers do.
Post reply on HN