Earlier quoted context omitted.
> meanwhile those struggling from inequality, not being here, will fail to have their voice heard. And so the echo chamber ensues. Those struggling from from inequality are struggling from relative deprivation, not absolute deprivation, while the latter is the only thing that rationally matters. I don't give a damn that Bill Gates is a ridiculous amount richer than me, in fact I admire him and want to be rich too som…
Society has to decide what "right" people have to a certain minimum quality of life and access to services. It turns out the level can actually be quite high, one only need look to the highly successful Nordic states. The argument in america seems to be that if you work hard, you can have a decent life and a house in the suburbs. There are already problems here, what of the people born with disabilities? But assuming…
No, you did not take it from them. They willingly gave it to you. You are free to give it to them, but you choose not to.
> I don't believe that wealthy people should get to choose were their money goes. That's a decision for society as a whole
Please do not equate any body of government to "society as a whole."
Even in a true democracy where everyone votes, the majority will never have an adequate enough perspective to ensure funds are correctly distributed.
I don't know your friend. How can I know what he needs? How do you expect the real specific cases to be solved without direct assistance from someone (an individual, a charity) who knows how to help?